← Search

Katharine Mancini

Seattle, WA
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
180 matches · 106W–74L · seasons 2020–2026

Captains: add Katharine Mancini to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history180 matches
W
2025-11-23 · TCSP-Penn Pals-Cilluffo · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Nick Cilluffo mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-1
L
2025-11-14 · NTC-Tuesdays with Joey-Goyal · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Gerry Wang mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 4-6
W
2025-10-25 · TCSP-Penn Pals-Cilluffo · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Dustin Taylor mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W
2025-10-17 · TCSP-Penn Pals-Cilluffo · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Alexander Ung mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-2
W
2025-10-07 · Mancini · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
L
2025-10-04 · TCSP-Penn Pals-Cilluffo · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Alexander Ung mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 2-6, 0-1
L
2025-09-26 · NTC-Tuesdays with Joey-Goyal · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Gerry Wang mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 1-6
W
2025-08-08 · Net Play · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Sarah Wilke
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-0
W
2025-08-06 · Net Play · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Sarah Wilke
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
W
2025-08-05 · Net Play · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Sarah Wilke
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
W
2025-08-03 · Net Play · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Sarah Wilke
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
W
2025-07-30 · Net Play · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Sarah Wilke
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams32 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.0
72.3%
60W–23L · 60.1% of games
3.5
46.7%
7W–8L · 53.3% of games
3.0mixed
45.5%
15W–18L · 48.7% of games
3.5mixed
44.4%
4W–5L · 45.9% of games
6.0mixed
58.3%
14W–10L · 57.2% of games
7.0mixed
14.3%
1W–6L · 37.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Singles, 29% of the time
#1 Singles
29%
53 matches
#1 Doubles
22%
39 matches
#1 Female Doubles
13%
23 matches
#1 Female Singles
12%
21 matches
#2 Doubles
11%
19 matches
#2 Singles
7%
12 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to believe in the long term plan you have but you need the short term goals to motivate and inspire you.
Roger Federer