← Search

Teanen Chen

Seattle, WA
3.0C year-end 2025
94 matches · 44W–50L · seasons 2024–2026
Bump probability
2.53.03.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.16
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 30 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 2.5
2%
stay 3.0
98%
up to 3.5
Projected to December: 0% down · 32% stay · 68% up, from a year-end estimate of 3.04. Lower than today’s 3.16 because form regresses — players this far above their band partway through a season have historically finished nearer the middle of it. Keep playing at this level and the numbers above are the ones that hold.

A 3.0 runs from 2.51 to 3.00. This rating sits in the top of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Seattle · 3.0
14 of 213
WA · 3.0
54 of 960

Teanen is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Teanen has been a steady 3.0 across all 3 seasons on record.

2.53.0202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 3.0, Teanen has gone from the 11th to the 89th percentile of players at that level, 2024 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level5 levels played
0.0
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
3.0
54.1%
20W–17L · 52.9% of games
3.5
37%
10W–17L · 46.3% of games
6.0mixed
50%
2W–2L · 50.6% of games
7.0mixed
38.5%
5W–8L · 41.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history94 matches
W
Zeran Wang / Xiayi Lichamps
2026-06-21 · #2 Doubles · with Jade Phan
+0.006better than expected — took 65% of games against 59% expected
6-2, 7-5
W
Sarah Bierlink / Ali Jones - (DQ)champs
2026-06-20 · #1 Doubles · with Erica Jordan
−0.002about as expected — took 63% of games against 61% expected
6-3, 6-4
W
Sarah Yoon / Jingjing Cai
2026-06-16 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sienna Rice
+0.016better than expected — took 53% of games against 46% expected
6-2, 2-6, 1-0
L
Estelle Erhardt / Daria Opekunovachamps
2026-06-14 · #1 Doubles · with Lesley Yuasa
−0.003about as expected — took 43% of games against 45% expected
6-2, 5-7, 1-0
L
Kate Bayleychamps
2026-06-12 · #2 Singles
−0.036below expectation — took 40% of games against 56% expected
5-7, 6-1, 1-0
L
2026-05-31 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sienna Rice
+0.015about as expected — took 35% of games against 34% expected
6-0, 4-6, 1-0
W
Christine Huoth
2026-05-17 · #1 Singles · 3.0
−0.034below expectation — took 68% of games against 74% expected
7-5, 6-1
L
2026-05-09 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Tiffany Chau
+0.026better than expected — took 59% of games against 45% expected
0-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
Elizabeth Evans / Julia King Hately
2026-05-09 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sharon Fang
+0.044better than expected — took 75% of games against 52% expected
6-2, 6-2
W
Anne Manicone
2026-05-01 · #1 Singles · 3.0
+0.015better than expected — took 86% of games against 69% expected
6-2, 6-0
W
2026-04-19 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Tiffany Chau
+0.038better than expected — took 80% of games against 58% expected
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-04-18 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tiffany Chau
+0.041better than expected — took 63% of games against 44% expected
6-4, 6-3
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.