← Search

Daria Opekunova

Seattle, WA
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
87 matches · 42W–45L · seasons 2022–2026

Captains: add Daria Opekunova to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history87 matches
W
2026-08-11 · Flex Appeal-Opekunova · #1 Female Singles · 0.0 mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3
L
2026-07-26 · Sugar & Slice · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lori Beehner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
W
2026-07-25 · Sugar & Slice · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lori Beehner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 7-6, 1-0
L
2026-07-20 · Sugar & Slice · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Anne Diaw
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 6-3, 0-1
L
2026-07-19 · Sugar & Slice · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lori Beehner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-07-07 · Two-Body Problem · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jemimah Kim
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-0
L
2026-07-05 · Sugar & Slice · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Anne Diaw
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 1-6, 0-1
W
2026-06-14 · #1 Doubles · with Estelle Erhardt championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 5-7, 1-0
W
2026-06-06 · ETC-Split Step-Opekunova · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jemimah Kim
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-3
W
2026-05-23 · AYTC-Slice Girls Don't Blink-Thompson · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Deb Holbrook
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-0
W
2026-05-16 · ETC-Split Step-Opekunova · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Alexia Cosatto
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
L
2026-05-10 · ETC-Split Step-Opekunova · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jemimah Kim
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-2, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams22 teams · 2022–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.0
50%
18W–18L · 48.2% of games
3.5
28.6%
2W–5L · 46.5% of games
0.0mixed
85.7%
6W–1L · 64.5% of games
3.0mixed
54.5%
6W–5L · 54.9% of games
3.5mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
38.5%
5W–8L · 47.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 38% of the time
#1 Doubles
38%
33 matches
#2 Doubles
18%
16 matches
#3 Doubles
13%
11 matches
#1 Female Doubles
10%
9 matches
#1 Mixed Doubles
9%
8 matches
#1 Female Singles
5%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to believe in the long term plan you have but you need the short term goals to motivate and inspire you.
Roger Federer