← Search

John Raffetto

Bellevue, WA
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
89 matches · 45W–44L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add John Raffetto to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history89 matches
L
2026-06-26 · ETC-Holmgren · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Stephanie Raffetto mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 6-2, 0-1
W
Candis Brink / Atanas Koralski
2026-06-12 · ETC-Holmgren · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Stephanie Raffetto mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-7, 1-0
L
2026-05-10 · RBW-Long Shots-Ferre · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Abhishek Goswami
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 0-6
W
2026-05-03 · RBW-Long Shots-Ferre · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with David Relyea
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
L
Mark Chen / Ben Stickley
2026-04-19 · RBW-Long Shots-Ferre · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Abhishek Goswami
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
W
N/A
2026-03-01 · RBW-Long Shots-Ferre · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Don Schultz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-02-08 · RBW-Long Shots-Ferre · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Dhiraj Madan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-3, 0-1
L
2026-01-18 · RBW-Long Shots-Ferre · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Andy Rivas
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
W
2026-01-10 · RBW-Long Shots-Ferre · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Andy Rivas
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 7-5
L
2025-11-23 · RBW-Holmgren · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Stephanie Raffetto mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 1-6
L
2025-11-16 · RBW-Holmgren · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Joanne Yu mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 0-6, 0-1
W
2025-10-26 · RBW-Holmgren · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Stephanie Raffetto mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 6-3, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams20 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.0
58.3%
35W–25L · 55.2% of games
6.0
0%
0W–4L · 31% of games
6.0mixed
41.7%
10W–14L · 47.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 36% of the time
#2 Doubles
36%
32 matches
#3 Doubles
35%
31 matches
#1 Doubles
29%
26 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert