← Search

Atanas Koralski

Redmond, WA
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
66 matches · 35W–31L · seasons 2024–2027

Captains: add Atanas Koralski to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history66 matches
W
2026-09-12 · CP-Mixed Force-Wong · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Chandler Wadsworth mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 7-5
W
2026-07-25 · CP-Koralska · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Katie van Zyl mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-1
W
2026-07-18 · CP-Koralska · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Katie van Zyl mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-1, 1-0
W
2026-06-27 · CP-Koralska · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Kimberly Wong mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-2
L
2026-06-12 · CP-Koralska · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Candis Brink mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 7-6, 0-1
L
2026-05-30 · CP-Racquet Rascals-Kaliyaperumal · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with David Grace
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 2-6, 0-1
L
2026-05-01 · CP-Racquet Rascals-Kaliyaperumal · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Diego Piacentini
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 5-7
W
2026-04-26 · CP-Racquet Rascals-Kaliyaperumal · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kesav Kaliyaperumal
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-6
L
2026-04-18 · CP-Racquet Rascals-Kaliyaperumal · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kesav Kaliyaperumal
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 5-7
L
2026-04-11 · CP-Racquet Rascals-Kaliyaperumal · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with David Grace
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-6, 0-1
L
2026-04-04 · CP-Legends-von Gortler · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Atanas Koralski - *
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
L
2026-03-28 · CP-Legends-von Gortler · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Atsushi Yoshida
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 0-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams16 teams · 2024–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
2.5
58.3%
7W–5L · 57.1% of games
3.0
36.4%
8W–14L · 44.8% of games
3.5
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
0.0mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
3.0mixed
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
68.2%
15W–7L · 58.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 47% of the time
#1 Doubles
47%
31 matches
#3 Doubles
26%
17 matches
#1 Singles
14%
9 matches
#2 Doubles
14%
9 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Experience is a big word. I think it comes with time, and I have that.
Serena Williams