Search

Chris Gonzales

Brier, WA
3.0C year-end 2025
151 matches · 56W–95L · seasons 20202026
Bump probability
2.53.03.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

2.78
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 19 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 2.5
100%
stay 3.0
0%
up to 3.5

A 3.0 runs from 2.51 to 3.00. This rating sits in the middle of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
WA · 3.0
610 of 755

Chris is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Chris has been 3.0 for all 7 seasons on record, but moved a long way inside it — from the bottom of the band to the top.

2.53.02020202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 3.0, Chris has gone from the 52nd to the 42nd percentile of players at that level, 2020 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level5 levels played
3.0
44.8%
30W–37L · 47.5% of games
3.5
20%
2W–8L · 34.1% of games
6.0
35.5%
11W–20L · 47.6% of games
7.0
27.3%
3W–8L · 43.2% of games
6.0mixed
33.3%
10W–20L · 45.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history151 matches
L
Sanjay Chopra / Barty Nicholsonmixed
2026-07-25 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Ron Atienza
+0.000below expectation — took 29% of games against 50% expected
6-2, 6-3
L
Walt Drevas / Kim Careymixed
2026-07-04 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Ron Atienza
+0.000better than expected — took 33% of games against 20% expected
6-2, 6-4
L
2026-06-21 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Christopher Robertson
+0.000below expectation — took 29% of games against 39% expected
6-3, 6-2
L
Anca Zaharia / Ellen Owen
2026-05-03 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Teresa Cueto
0.056below expectation — took 25% of games against 54% expected
6-4, 6-0
L
Daria Opekunova / Jemimah Kim
2026-04-25 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Teresa Cueto
0.034below expectation — took 25% of games against 44% expected
6-0, 6-4
W
Gogo Chan / Wen Cui
2026-04-11 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Teresa Cueto
+0.035better than expected — took 72% of games against 53% expected
6-0, 7-5
W
Jolene Parisio / Sarah Gardner
2026-04-04 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Brittney Davis
0.007about as expected — took 59% of games against 60% expected
6-7, 6-2, 1-0
W
Jill Walzer / Rebecca Hoogs
2026-03-15 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Abby Miller
+0.039better than expected — took 65% of games against 46% expected
7-5, 6-2
W
Jackie Fuller / Debbie Schrock
2026-02-07 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Teresa Cueto
0.003about as expected — took 47% of games against 50% expected
6-3, 1-6, 1-0
L
Catherine Morello / Nancy Rodriguez
2026-01-31 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Naomi Mora
0.034below expectation — took 48% of games against 60% expected
4-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
Barty Nicholson / Theresa Cochran
2026-01-17 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Victoria van Gelderen
+0.024better than expected — took 56% of games against 45% expected
3-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-01-03 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Naomi Mora
0.034below expectation — took 47% of games against 62% expected
6-4, 2-6, 1-0
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.