← Search

Chris Gonzales

Brier, WA
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
154 matches · 57W–97L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Chris Gonzales to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history154 matches
L
2026-08-09 · FC-Mora/Robertson · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Thomas Stave mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 3-6
L
2026-07-25 · FC-Mora/Robertson · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Ron Atienza mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-07-04 · FC-Mora/Robertson · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Ron Atienza mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 4-6
L
2026-06-21 · FC-Mora/Robertson · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Christopher Robertson mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-05-03 · FC-Sharma · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Teresa Cueto
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 0-6
L
2026-04-25 · FC-Sharma · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Teresa Cueto
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 4-6
W
2026-04-11 · FC-Sharma · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Teresa Cueto
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 7-5
W
2026-04-04 · FC-Sharma · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Brittney Davis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-03-15 · FC-Pinkerton/Mora · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Abby Miller
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-2
W
2026-02-07 · FC-Pinkerton/Mora · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Teresa Cueto
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 1-6, 1-0
L
2026-01-31 · FC-Pinkerton/Mora · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Naomi Mora
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-6, 0-1
W
2026-01-17 · FC-Pinkerton/Mora · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Victoria van Gelderen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-2, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams29 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.0
44.8%
30W–37L · 47.5% of games
3.5
20%
2W–8L · 34.1% of games
6.0
35.5%
11W–20L · 47.6% of games
7.0
27.3%
3W–8L · 43.2% of games
6.0mixed
33.3%
11W–22L · 44.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 41% of the time
#3 Doubles
41%
63 matches
#2 Doubles
30%
46 matches
#1 Doubles
29%
45 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You can get through anything if you keep going one point at a time.
Arthur Ashe