Search

Li Qin

Bellevue, WA
2.5C year-end 2025
141 matches · 40W–101L · seasons 20192026
Bump probability
2.02.53.0lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

2.74
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 23 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 2.0
0%
stay 2.5
100%
up to 3.0
Projected to December: 0% down · 10% stay · 90% up, from a year-end estimate of 2.60. Lower than today’s 2.74 because form regresses — players this far above their band partway through a season have historically finished nearer the middle of it. Keep playing at this level and the numbers above are the ones that hold.

A 2.5 runs from 2.01 to 2.50. This rating sits in the top of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
WA · 2.5
4 of 57

Li is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Li has played at 2.5, 3.0 across 6 seasons — 2 moves up and 2 down.

2.02.53.0201920222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 3.0, Li has gone from the 0th to the 51st percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level3 levels played
2.5
60%
15W–10L · 53% of games
3.0
15.2%
12W–67L · 32.9% of games
6.0mixed
35.1%
13W–24L · 42% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history141 matches
W
Paul Moosman / Rui Huangmixed
2026-07-25 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Hasnain Syed
+0.000better than expected — took 71% of games against 60% expected
6-3, 6-2
L
Jia Tang / Ann Trivett
2026-07-20 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Giuliana Guilherme
0.020about as expected — took 56% of games against 60% expected
6-4, 1-6, 1-0
W
Yunting Li / Sheila Wang
2026-07-08 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Giuliana Guilherme
+0.047better than expected — took 80% of games against 54% expected
6-1, 6-2
L
Alison Muir / Courtney Pucci-Babcock
2026-07-05 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Dana Cozmei
0.038below expectation — took 20% of games against 42% expected
6-3, 6-0
W
Lore Morgan / Toni Adams
2026-06-23 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Giuliana Guilherme
+0.002about as expected — took 63% of games against 60% expected
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-06-21 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Hasnain Syed
+0.000below expectation — took 65% of games against 70% expected
7-5, 6-2
L
Neesha Tandon / Forrest Redamixed
2026-06-13 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Ross Carter
+0.000below expectation — took 38% of games against 57% expected
6-3, 7-5
W
N/A
2026-05-29 · #1 Singles · 2.5
+0.073better than expected — took 100% of games against 58% expected
6-0, 6-0
W
Connie Manson / Maria McBride
2026-03-07 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Dana Cozmei
+0.010better than expected — took 60% of games against 55% expected
6-3, 6-5
L
Vicky Dinh / My-Hong Truong
2026-02-28 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Nicoleta Cristache
0.049below expectation — took 20% of games against 47% expected
6-3, 6-0
L
Larisa Kaukonen
2026-02-23 · #1 Singles · 2.5
0.109below expectation — took 25% of games against 69% expected
6-3, 6-1
W
N/A
2026-02-21 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Mengye Guo
+0.072better than expected — took 100% of games against 58% expected
6-0, 6-0
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.