Teams

PSC-High Five-Qin

2026 Mixed 40 & Over · 6.0

17 players · average NTRP 2.89 / NORTHWEST WASHINGTON

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2026-08-08vs AYTC-VieraLost 12
L#1 DoublesZhe Wang / Nan Li vs Andrew Buhayar / Lara van Cise2-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesQinjia Hackett / Roger Hackett vs Jon Kawaguchi / Elaine Lee2-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesLi Qin / Khashayar Nikzad vs Christopher Ma / Adora Moncada6-4, 7-5
2026-08-01vs BETC-RuthLost 03
L#1 DoublesZhe Wang / Jing Li vs Lily Ng / Chen Hsu0-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesRoger Hackett / Qinjia Hackett vs Dennis Oh / Kyung Mi Lee6-4, 0-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesKhashayar Nikzad / Iuliana Marinov vs Darrin Whitley / Ngoc Huynh6-4, 5-7, 0-1
2026-07-25vs EDG-Rock-MachLost 12
L#1 DoublesNan Li / Zhe Wang vs Elizaveta Hermann / Ticson MacH1-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesMengye Guo / Chongzhi Di vs Thomas Hei / Nelly Ketefian0-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesHasnain Syed / Li Qin vs Paul Moosman / Rui Huang6-3, 6-2
2026-07-17vs ETC-LuckyShots-LiWon 21
L#1 DoublesJing Li / Zhe Wang vs Lisa C / John Tran2-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesBo Zhang / Iuliana Marinov vs Ale Jimenez / Changsong Shen6-4, 6-4
W#3 DoublesDana Cozmei / Lucian Cristache vs WENSI LI / Hongjuan Zhang4-6, 7-6, 1-0
2026-06-28vs TCSP-Summer Lobbing-GatchecoLost 03
L#1 DoublesNicoleta Cristache / Lucian Cristache vs Jason Schroeder / Annabella Chiocco4-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesRoss Carter / Iuliana Marinov vs Aki Tameling / Mark Litton5-7, 3-6
L#3 DoublesRoger Hackett / Qinjia Hackett vs Teresa Engrav / Nick Cilluffo1-6, 6-4, 0-1
2026-06-21vs WSC-Dacia-ClinciuWon 21
W#1 DoublesNicoleta Cristache / Chongzhi Di vs Clement Ifrim / Gabi Ifrim6-4, 1-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesLi Qin / Hasnain Syed vs Ioan Smintina / Maria Smintina7-5, 6-2
L#3 DoublesDana Cozmei / Khashayar Nikzad vs Ciprian Clinciu / Camelia Clinciu4-6, 6-2, 0-1
2026-06-13vs HBSQ-Reda/TandonLost 03
L#1 DoublesChongzhi Di / Mengye Guo vs Amgalan Danjuur / Undariya Sukhbat0-6, 7-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesRoss Carter / Li Qin vs Neesha Tandon / Forrest Reda3-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesKhashayar Nikzad / Iuliana Marinov vs David Eckols / Annie Spalding6-3, 3-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 6.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.63 estimated across 16 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.21
Jing Li
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.09
Hasnain Syed
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.06
Nan Li
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
2.83
Mengye Guo
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.82
Bo Zhang
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.74
Khashayar Nikzad
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.69
Nicoleta Cristache
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.59
Iuliana Marinov
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.54
Dana Cozmei
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.52
Chongzhi Di
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.41
Roger Hackett
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
2.41
Shuja Rahman
published
2.38
Qinjia Hackett
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
2.35
Li Qin
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 2.5
2.25
Lucian Cristache
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 2.5
2.16
Zhe Wang
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Ross Carter
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Li Qin + Hasnain Syed5450% games+0.5% vs expected
Mengye Guo + Chongzhi Di2342% gamesnot enough data
Nicoleta Cristache + Lucian Cristache044 matchesnot enough data
Qinjia Hackett + Roger Hackett033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jing Li
47W–31L career · 2 lines in 2026
6%92%2%
3.21
3.5
Hasnain Syed
51W–77L career · 2 lines in 2026
26%74%<1%
3.09
3.5
Nan Li
62W–60L career · type A · 5 lines in 2026
33%67%<1%
3.06
3
Mengye Guo
6W–11L career · type S · 2 lines in 2026
1%88%11%
2.83
3
Bo Zhang
28W–18L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%89%9%
2.82
3
Khashayar Nikzad
1W–11L career · type M · 4 lines in 2026
4%93%3%
2.74
3
Nicoleta Cristache
65W–59L career · 4 lines in 2026
8%90%1%
2.69
3
Iuliana Marinov
18W–27L career · 4 lines in 2026
25%75%<1%
2.59
3
Dana Cozmei
59W–76L career · 3 lines in 2026
39%61%<1%
2.54
3
Chongzhi Di
13W–10L career · 3 lines in 2026
46%54%<1%
2.52
2.5
Roger Hackett
0W–3L career · type T · 3 lines in 2026
0%74%26%
2.41
Shuja Rahman
4W–13L career · no lines in 2026
74%26%<1%
2.41
2.5
Qinjia Hackett
5W–8L career · type S · 3 lines in 2026
0%81%19%
2.38
2.5
Li Qin
41W–104L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%86%14%
2.35
2.5
Lucian Cristache
4W–8L career · type M · 2 lines in 2026
0%96%4%
2.25
2.5
Zhe Wang
5W–14L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%99%1%
2.16
Ross Carter
0W–5L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.