← Search

Sheila Kirkegaard

Snoqualmie, WA
2.5C year-end 2025
158 matches · 50W–108L · seasons 2019–2026
Bump probability
2.02.53.0lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

2.64
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 18 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 2.0
4%
stay 2.5
96%
up to 3.0
Projected to December: 0% down · 40% stay · 60% up, from a year-end estimate of 2.52. Lower than today’s 2.64 because form regresses — players this far above their band partway through a season have historically finished nearer the middle of it. Keep playing at this level and the numbers above are the ones that hold.

A 2.5 runs from 2.01 to 2.50. This rating sits in the top of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
WA · 2.5
10 of 35

Sheila is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Sheila has played at 2.5, 3.0 across 7 seasons — 2 moves up and 1 down.

2.02.53.02019202020212022202320252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 3.0, Sheila has gone from the 5th to the 21st percentile of players at that level, 2023 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level3 levels played
2.5
50%
25W–25L · 48.5% of games
3.0
21.5%
14W–51L · 35.8% of games
6.0mixed
25.6%
10W–29L · 39.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history158 matches
W
Elizabeth Amick / Senthil Kumar Muthumixed
2026-07-24 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Niels Kirkegaard
+0.000better than expected — took 52% of games against 38% expected
4-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
Pallavi Taleppadi / Jeremy Newton-Smithmixed
2026-07-03 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Niels Kirkegaard
+0.000below expectation — took 33% of games against 41% expected
6-3, 6-3
L
Ying Yan
2026-06-06 · #2 Singles · 3.0
−0.037below expectation — took 20% of games against 42% expected
6-2, 6-1
W
Tammy Besel
2026-05-30 · #2 Singles · 3.0
+0.050better than expected — took 67% of games against 43% expected
6-4, 6-2
L
Sophia Cheng
2026-05-28 · #1 Singles · 3.0
−0.066below expectation — took 14% of games against 50% expected
6-1, 6-1
L
Man Feng / Sihui Wang
2026-05-23 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Nicole Carrido
−0.047below expectation — took 8% of games against 38% expected
6-0, 6-1
W
Amy King / Myoungju Baek
2026-05-16 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jing Long
+0.024better than expected — took 63% of games against 51% expected
6-4, 6-3
L
Amanda Amsel
2026-05-02 · #1 Singles · 3.0
+0.002about as expected — took 48% of games against 46% expected
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W
Catherine Nielsen
2026-04-23 · #1 Singles · 3.0
+0.031better than expected — took 67% of games against 51% expected
6-3, 6-3
L
Heidi Owen / Gayle Burlinson
2026-04-19 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Sherry Yang
−0.004about as expected — took 45% of games against 47% expected
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
Iris Cai
2026-04-09 · #1 Singles · 3.0
−0.016below expectation — took 37% of games against 46% expected
6-3, 6-4
L
Jenny Ott / Lisa Mihm
2026-03-29 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Sherry Yang
−0.016below expectation — took 38% of games against 46% expected
6-1, 6-7, 1-0
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.