Teams

RBW-BigMacs-McAllen

2024 Adult 18 & Over · 3.5 Women

16 players · average NTRP 3.53 / NORTHWEST WASHINGTON

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2024-05-16vs AYTC-Ballers-NisetWon 32
L#1 DoublesBrenda Kim / Kimberly McCallum vs Mila Niset / Katrina Miller2-6, 4-6
W#1 SinglesNozomi Park vs Belinda Leung6-4, 6-7, 1-0
W#2 DoublesMadalena McAllen / Antonette Wood vs Julia Pollock / PeiPei Sung7-6, 6-1
L#2 SinglesCindy Paborsky vs Rebecca Robbins4-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesNaoko Reynolds / Ellen Murphy vs Leona De Rocco / Linda Brummett6-2, 6-3
2024-05-10vs STC-AncinasWon 41
L#1 DoublesHeidi Hollyhead / Ellen Murphy vs Julia King Hately / Bokgi Choi6-2, 6-7, 0-1
W#1 SinglesCindy Paborsky vs Amy Friedland6-4, 7-6
W#2 DoublesAntonette Wood / Elaine McCall vs Becca Tessin / Lisa Edlin6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W#2 SinglesDenise Ryan vs Eda Topur7-6, 7-6
W#3 DoublesLeilani de Jong / Natalie Delbrueck vs Wendy La Cava / Lynne Parrott6-2, 7-5
2024-05-02vs BC-Sirotta/ShieldsWon 41
L#1 DoublesEllen Murphy / Cindy Paborsky vs Debbie McAllister / Nancy Burlingame3-6, 0-6
W#1 SinglesNozomi Park vs Nur Ozkaraoglu6-0, 6-2
W#2 DoublesBrenda Kim / Leilani de Jong vs Cammi Libby / Christie Ritchie6-4, 7-5
W#2 SinglesTerri Smith vs Mihaela Olariu Ureche6-2, 4-2
W#3 DoublesNaoko Reynolds / Heidi Hollyhead vs Andrea Snyder / Monika Jackson3-6, 6-3, 1-0
2024-04-26vs CAC/SL-BallBusters-AndersonWon 41
L#1 DoublesEllen Murphy / Madalena McAllen vs Joan Wilson / Michele Soelling3-6, 7-6, 0-1
W#1 SinglesNozomi Park vs Chrissy O'Rourke6-2, 6-0
W#2 DoublesTerri Smith / Kimberly McCallum vs Holly Anderson / Jinhee Park6-1, 6-3
W#2 SinglesNaoko Reynolds vs Colleen Tracy6-2, 6-4
W#3 DoublesNatalie Delbrueck / Brenda Kim vs Kim Carey / Lynn StSauver6-0, 6-3
2024-04-19vs AYTC-BejanWon 40
W#1 SinglesNozomi Park vs Alexa Crawford6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesMadalena McAllen / Ellen Murphy vs Heather Thoren / Bonne Bejan6-2, 6-4
W#2 SinglesDenise Ryan vs Barb Bodine4-6, 7-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesLeilani de Jong / Natalie Delbrueck vs Kathryn Sullivan / Lori Neeley7-6, 6-3
2024-04-11vs WSC-Momentum-HarrisWon 50
W#1 DoublesJoanne Bastian / Terri Smith vs Barbara Smith / Tammi Walker6-2, 6-1
W#1 SinglesNozomi Park vs Deanne Angell6-1, 6-4
W#2 DoublesElaine McCall / Antonette Wood vs Lori Harris / Darlene Jones6-3, 5-7, 1-0
W#2 SinglesCindy Paborsky vs Kristen Mosebar6-7, 6-4, 1-0
W#3 DoublesBrenda Kim / Natalie Delbrueck vs Janine Dunbar / Suzanne Monson6-3, 6-0
2024-04-04vs TCSP-LampittWon 32
L#1 DoublesBrenda Kim / Kimberly McCallum vs Jamie Carr / Courtney Meyer4-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesNaoko Reynolds vs Nicole Janson2-6, 5-7
W#2 DoublesEllen Murphy / Cindy Paborsky vs Andrea Lang / Amanda Weaver3-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#2 SinglesNozomi Park vs Amy Quilter6-2, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesLeilani de Jong / Antonette Wood vs Melissa McMurray / Ann Wood6-4, 7-5
2024-03-28vs MI-KellyWon 32
L#1 DoublesNaoko Reynolds / Brenda Kim vs Dorrinda Pierce / Sonal Nyati3-6, 3-6
W#1 SinglesNozomi Park vs Marlita Bang6-3, 6-3
W#2 DoublesCindy Paborsky / Ellen Murphy vs Elizabeth Carson / Kelsey Joyce6-1, 6-2
W#2 SinglesTerri Smith vs Shumei Lin6-2, 6-1
L#3 DoublesMadalena McAllen / Joanne Bastian vs Emer Hensey / Helen Kelly6-3, 3-6, 0-1
2024-03-22vs TCSP-Wildcardz-KormanWon 50
W#1 DoublesBrenda Kim / Leilani de Jong vs Molly Black / Sara Shelton6-3, 6-1
W#1 SinglesNozomi Park vs Christi Nagle6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesCindy Paborsky / Elaine McCall vs Lisa Lydon / Elizabeth Kain6-3, 6-2
W#2 SinglesNaoko Reynolds vs Donna Lou6-0, 6-3
W#3 DoublesMadalena McAllen / Natalie Delbrueck vs Jennifer Andrews / Kimberly Miller7-5, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.26 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.68
Terri Smith
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 4
3.42
Ellen Murphy
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.39
Kimberly McCallum
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.34
Cheryl Doke
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.34
Madalena McAllen
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.27
Brenda Kim
usually #1 Doubles 62%, also #2 Doubles 23% · published 3.5
3.26
Naoko Reynolds
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #2 Singles 25% · published 3.5
Elaine McCall
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Nozomi Park
usually #1 Singles 88%, also #2 Singles 13% · published 3.5
3.21
Antonette Wood
usually #2 Doubles 56%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.18
Cindy Paborsky
usually #2 Doubles 30%, also #3 Doubles 30% · published 3.5
3.17
Joanne Bastian
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.14
Natalie Delbrueck
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.13
Heidi Hollyhead
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.05
Leilani de Jong
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.02
Denise Ryan
usually #2 Singles 100% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Ellen Murphy + Naoko Reynolds5261% games+11.3% vs expected
Joanne Bastian + Elaine McCall4163% games+7.6% vs expected
Brenda Kim + Naoko Reynolds4255% games+5.8% vs expected
Joanne Bastian + Madalena McAllen3257% games+5.8% vs expected
Ellen Murphy + Brenda Kim7653% games+5.3% vs expected
Brenda Kim + Madalena McAllen10553% games+4.8% vs expected
Naoko Reynolds + Terri Smith24856% games+4.5% vs expected
Joanne Bastian + Naoko Reynolds3253% games+3.8% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Terri Smith
176W–102L career · 6 lines in 2024
10%89%1%
3.68
3.5
Ellen Murphy
69W–74L career · 12 lines in 2024
<1%70%30%
3.42
3.5
Kimberly McCallum
71W–54L career · 6 lines in 2024
<1%78%22%
3.39
3.5
Cheryl Doke
84W–43L career · 4 lines in 2024
1%86%13%
3.34
3.5
Madalena McAllen
138W–72L career · 5 lines in 2024
1%86%13%
3.34
3.5
Brenda Kim
90W–76L career · 13 lines in 2024
3%92%5%
3.27
3.5
Naoko Reynolds
122W–85L career · 11 lines in 2024
3%93%4%
3.26
3.5
Elaine McCall
16W–14L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data
3.5
Nozomi Park
74W–11L career · 8 lines in 2024
not enough data
3.5
Antonette Wood
152W–134L career · 9 lines in 2024
6%92%2%
3.21
3.5
Cindy Paborsky
27W–30L career · 9 lines in 2024
10%89%1%
3.18
3.5
Joanne Bastian
45W–41L career · 2 lines in 2024
11%88%1%
3.17
3.5
Natalie Delbrueck
65W–39L career · 5 lines in 2024
16%83%<1%
3.14
3.5
Heidi Hollyhead
70W–69L career · 4 lines in 2024
18%81%<1%
3.13
3.5
Leilani de Jong
51W–53L career · 5 lines in 2024
37%63%<1%
3.05
3.5
Denise Ryan
41W–38L career · 2 lines in 2024
44%56%<1%
3.02

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.