← Search

Kimberly McCallum

Seattle, WA
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
125 matches · 71W–54L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Kimberly McCallum to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history125 matches
W
2026-06-13 · #2 Doubles · with Naoko Reynolds championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-06-05 · RBW-Thunderbirds-Ge · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Brenda Kim
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
W
2026-05-22 · RBW-Thunderbirds-Ge · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Naoko Reynolds
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
L
2025-05-16 · RBW-Kim · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Krista Philbrick
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2025-04-25 · TCSP-Slice and Dice-Johnson · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sandra Cornwall
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
L
2025-04-18 · RBW-Kim · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Erin Logsdon
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-5, 0-1
W
2025-04-11 · TCSP-Slice and Dice-Johnson · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Megan Johnson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
L
2025-04-11 · RBW-Kim · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Terri Smith
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 0-1
W
2025-03-28 · RBW-Kim · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Erin Logsdon
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
2025-03-02 · RBW-WAM-Kim · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Annie Luong
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 4-4
W
2025-02-23 · RBW-WAM-Kim · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Heidi Richter
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-4, 1-0
W
2025-02-22 · RBW-Murphy · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Terri Smith
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams26 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.5
73%
46W–17L · 58.6% of games
4.0
27.3%
9W–24L · 44.2% of games
7.0mixed
28.6%
2W–5L · 46.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 38% of the time
#1 Doubles
38%
47 matches
#2 Doubles
34%
42 matches
#3 Doubles
29%
36 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You can get through anything if you keep going one point at a time.
Arthur Ashe