Search

Christina Jones

Seattle, WA
3.5C year-end 2025
85 matches · 32W–53L · seasons 20192026
Where Christina sits
123
2.5
1173
3.0
1525
3.5
1013
4.0
423
4.5
66
5.0

Christina is one of 1525 women at 3.5 in this cohort of 4323. Levels at or below 3.5 account for 65% of them. Shown for women only: NTRP is a gender-specific standard, so a pooled curve would compare against the wrong bar.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Christina has played at 4.0, 3.5 across 6 seasons — 0 moves up and 1 down.

3.03.54.0201920202021202220232025

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history. The smaller, faded points — 2020, 2025 — rest on fewer than 5 matches, where the estimate is mostly the level the player was entered at rather than anything they did on court. Read the shape, not the value.

How you rank at your level
At 4.0, Christina has gone from the 49th to the 12th percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2023.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level4 levels played
4.0
44.9%
22W–27L · 50% of games
4.5
13.6%
3W–19L · 34.2% of games
8.0
25%
1W–3L · 35.8% of games
8.0mixed
50%
2W–2L · 37.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history85 matches
W
2025-11-02 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Patricia McKay
0.057below expectation — took 59% of games against 76% expected
3-6, 6-1, 1-0
L
2025-10-25 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Patricia McKay
0.029below expectation — took 25% of games against 42% expected
6-3, 6-1
W
2025-05-16 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Tina L Garcia
0.015below expectation — took 50% of games against 58% expected
2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2025-05-09 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Diana Stroble
0.040below expectation — took 25% of games against 47% expected
6-3, 6-1
L
2024-11-23 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Stacey Campbell
0.017below expectation — took 20% of games against 35% expected
6-2, 6-1
L
2024-09-22 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Cecile Delafield
0.033below expectation — took 37% of games against 53% expected
5-7, 6-0, 1-0
L
2023-08-08 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Amanda Rosauer
+0.000below expectation — took 29% of games against 35% expected
6-2, 6-3
W
2023-07-25 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Amanda Rosauer
+0.029better than expected — took 59% of games against 46% expected
6-3, 7-6
L
Ellie Chapman
2023-06-02 · #1 Singles · 4.0
0.047below expectation — took 0% of games against 33% expected
6-0, 6-0
L
2023-05-11 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Nasim Milani
0.028below expectation — took 40% of games against 53% expected
6-4, 6-4
L
Marcie Glenn
2023-05-05 · #1 Singles · 4.0
0.027below expectation — took 20% of games against 39% expected
6-1, 6-2
L
2023-04-28 · #1 Singles · 4.0
0.011about as expected — took 50% of games against 53% expected
4-6, 7-6, 1-0
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.