Search

Stacey Campbell

Seattle, WA
3.5C year-end 2025
95 matches · 50W–45L · seasons 20192026
Bump probability
3.03.54.0lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.41
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 7 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 3.0
86%
stay 3.5
14%
up to 4.0
Projected to December: 0% down · 97% stay · 3% up, from a year-end estimate of 3.35. Lower than today’s 3.41 because form regresses — players this far into their band partway through a season have historically finished nearer the middle of it. Keep playing at this level and the numbers above are the ones that hold.

A 3.5 runs from 3.01 to 3.50. This rating sits in the top of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Seattle · 3.5
55 of 256
WA · 3.5
250 of 1209

Stacey is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Stacey has played at 3.0, 3.5 across 6 seasons — 1 move up and 0 down.

2.53.03.5201920212022202320242025

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 4.0, Stacey has gone from the 50th to the 25th percentile of players at that level, 2023 to 2025.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level6 levels played
3.0
88.9%
8W–1L · 63.5% of games
3.5
49%
25W–26L · 50.7% of games
4.0
35.7%
5W–9L · 47.1% of games
7.0
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
8.0
50%
6W–6L · 47.6% of games
6.0mixed
2W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history95 matches
L
2025-11-07 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Susan Barker
0.002about as expected — took 48% of games against 48% expected
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W
2025-10-25 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Ann Skrobut
+0.028better than expected — took 75% of games against 58% expected
6-1, 6-3
W
2025-10-12 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Megan Johnson
+0.053better than expected — took 92% of games against 60% expected
6-0, 6-1
L
2025-09-20 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Susan Barker
0.003about as expected — took 35% of games against 39% expected
7-5, 6-2
W
2025-09-14 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Mikhaila Reudink
+0.006better than expected — took 75% of games against 65% expected
6-2, 6-2
W
2025-09-12 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Betsy Hendry
+0.004about as expected — took 60% of games against 57% expected
2-6, 6-0, 1-0
W
2025-09-05 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jennifer Czeisler
+0.025better than expected — took 57% of games against 46% expected
7-6, 6-4
L
2025-07-22 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Aime Mitchell
0.004about as expected — took 38% of games against 42% expected
6-7, 6-1, 1-0
W
Mary Fitzgerald / Kelsey Wong
2025-06-19 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Christine Acarregui
+0.024better than expected — took 65% of games against 52% expected
6-1, 7-6
L
2025-05-23 · #2 Singles · 4.0
0.024below expectation — took 29% of games against 43% expected
6-3, 6-2
L
Cheryl Hartman / Jameson Lyon
2025-05-15 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Melissa Jones
0.089below expectation — took 20% of games against 62% expected
6-2, 6-1
L
2025-05-09 · #2 Singles · 4.0
0.004below expectation — took 29% of games against 37% expected
6-3, 6-2
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.