Search

Smaranda Lieuallen

Redmond, WA
3.5C year-end 2025
166 matches · 86W–80L · seasons 20192026
Bump probability
3.03.54.0lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.07
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 22 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
20%
down to 3.0
80%
stay 3.5
0%
up to 4.0
Projected to December: 12% down · 88% stay · 0% up, from a year-end estimate of 3.09. Higher than today’s 3.07 because players this far below their band have historically finished nearer the middle of it.

A 3.5 runs from 3.01 to 3.50. This rating sits in the bottom of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Redmond · 3.5
43 of 43
WA · 3.5
1149 of 1209

Smaranda is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Smaranda has played at 3.5, 3.0 across 7 seasons — 1 move up and 1 down.

2.53.03.52020202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 3.5, Smaranda has gone from the 3rd to the 9th percentile of players at that level, 2020 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level5 levels played
3.0
69.7%
23W–10L · 60% of games
3.5
37.3%
22W–37L · 40.9% of games
7.0
14.3%
1W–6L · 33.3% of games
6.0mixed
72%
18W–7L · 58.5% of games
7.0mixed
45.2%
14W–17L · 47.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history166 matches
L
Caitlin Hennessy / Meghan Bradner
2026-07-29 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Joanne Yu
0.020below expectation — took 33% of games against 44% expected
6-4, 6-2
W
2026-07-26 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Adrian Dragusanu
+0.000better than expected — took 50% of games against 39% expected
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
Mallica Sikka / Miaomiao Zhang
2026-07-25 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Joanne Yu
0.012below expectation — took 20% of games against 34% expected
6-3, 6-0
W
2026-07-24 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Joanne Yu
+0.035better than expected — took 55% of games against 41% expected
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
Ale Jimenez / Shanti Thapa
2026-07-21 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Joanne Yu
0.029below expectation — took 8% of games against 32% expected
6-1, 6-0
L
2026-07-20 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Joanne Yu
+0.020about as expected — took 28% of games against 28% expected
7-5, 6-0
W
Gemma Gimpes / Dinesh Mandalapumixed
2026-07-18 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Alexandru Herman
+0.000better than expected — took 67% of games against 53% expected
6-2, 6-4
L
2026-06-06 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Siobhan Whitney
+0.008about as expected — took 42% of games against 40% expected
7-5, 4-3
L
2026-05-31 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Judit Velcsov
0.042below expectation — took 0% of games against 32% expected
6-0, 6-0
W
Suanty Kaghan / Kara Palmer
2026-05-08 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Judit Velcsov
+0.019better than expected — took 58% of games against 49% expected
6-2, 4-6, 1-0
L
Nita Khandelwal / Tammy Chu
2026-04-26 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kim Foote
0.086below expectation — took 14% of games against 58% expected
6-2, 6-0
W
Angelyn Regala / Tori Uphoff
2026-03-06 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Madalena McAllen
+0.031better than expected — took 75% of games against 57% expected
6-3, 6-1
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.