← Search

Emily Apfel

Redmond, WA
3.0C year-end 2025
100 matches · 53W–47L · seasons 2021–2026
Bump probability
2.53.03.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.08
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 18 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 2.5
15%
stay 3.0
85%
up to 3.5
Projected to December: 0% down · 60% stay · 40% up, from a year-end estimate of 2.98. Lower than today’s 3.08 because form regresses — players this far above their band partway through a season have historically finished nearer the middle of it. Keep playing at this level and the numbers above are the ones that hold.

A 3.0 runs from 2.51 to 3.00. This rating sits in the top of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Redmond · 3.0
6 of 17
WA · 3.0
124 of 755

Emily is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Emily has played at 2.5, 3.0 across 6 seasons — 1 move up and 0 down.

2.02.53.0202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 3.0, Emily has gone from the 32nd to the 49th percentile of players at that level, 2023 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level5 levels played
2.5
63.6%
7W–4L · 53.3% of games
3.0
53.8%
28W–24L · 49.3% of games
3.5
46.2%
6W–7L · 47.5% of games
6.0mixed
70%
7W–3L · 53.8% of games
7.0mixed
16.7%
1W–5L · 39% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history100 matches
L
2026-07-24 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kaushik Purohit
+0.000about as expected — took 50% of games against 53% expected
2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-07-18 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Bangwei Ma
+0.000below expectation — took 47% of games against 62% expected
1-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
Anton Piskunov / Elizaveta Hermannmixed
2026-06-13 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with ATUL ALATKAR
+0.000below expectation — took 25% of games against 59% expected
6-4, 6-0
W
2026-06-06 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Deb Nielsen
−0.008about as expected — took 58% of games against 60% expected
7-5, 4-3
W
Asha DSouza / Amy Scheer
2026-05-30 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tracy Brodahl
+0.049better than expected — took 71% of games against 46% expected
6-4, 6-1
L
Jenn Lee / Kayla Evans
2026-05-24 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tracy Brodahl
+0.024better than expected — took 44% of games against 36% expected
6-2, 3-6, 1-0
W
Aki Tameling / Jenny Sanders
2026-05-15 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tracy Brodahl
+0.048better than expected — took 75% of games against 50% expected
6-3, 6-1
L
2026-04-19 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tracy Brodahl
−0.003about as expected — took 37% of games against 41% expected
6-3, 6-4
L
Denise Dubuque / Angela Bolton
2026-03-01 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jean Tao
−0.013below expectation — took 29% of games against 39% expected
6-4, 6-1
W
2026-02-27 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Tracy Brodahl
+0.030better than expected — took 53% of games against 42% expected
6-1, 1-6, 1-0
L
Megan Lafountaine / Liesel Schilperoort
2026-02-21 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tracy Brodahl
+0.019better than expected — took 47% of games against 39% expected
6-2, 2-6, 1-0
W
Kendra Fang
2026-02-20 · #1 Female Singles · 3.0
−0.021below expectation — took 56% of games against 63% expected
5-4
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.