← Search

Meghan Bradner

Woodinville, WA
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
95 matches · 55W–40L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add Meghan Bradner to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history95 matches
L
2026-09-05 · Bradner · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
W
N/A
2026-08-06 · Baseline Beauties · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Caitlin Hennessy
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-07-30 · Rip Rip · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Christie Cabrera
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-07-29 · Baseline Beauties · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Caitlin Hennessy
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
L
2026-07-26 · Baseline Beauties · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Caitlin Hennessy
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
W
Kevin Bauer / Heather Bauer
2026-07-25 · WSC-ZenSpinners-Yang · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with David Zhao mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-0
L
2026-07-24 · Baseline Beauties · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Caitlin Hennessy
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
L
2026-07-21 · Bradner · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
W
2026-07-20 · Bradner · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
L
2026-07-19 · Rip Rip · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jennifer Eng
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
N/A
2026-07-18 · WSC-ZenSpinners-Yang · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Joseph Lam mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-07-14 · Baseline Beauties · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Caitlin Hennessy
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams22 teams · 2024–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
0.0
75%
3W–1L · 64.6% of games
2.5
59.4%
19W–13L · 56% of games
3.0
45.2%
14W–17L · 52% of games
3.5
50%
3W–3L · 46.5% of games
3.0mixed
57.1%
4W–3L · 64% of games
6.0mixed
100%
6W–0L · 73.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 40% of the time
#1 Doubles
40%
38 matches
#1 Singles
33%
31 matches
#2 Doubles
15%
14 matches
#3 Doubles
10%
9 matches
#1 Female Doubles
3%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.
Arthur Ashe