← Search

Sarah Wiggins

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Eugene, OR
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
75 matches · 48W–27L · seasons 2018–2026
Match history75 matches
W
2026-10-25 · ESTC-Mohler/Wolfe · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Katie Clawson
loading the estimate
6-3, 1-6, 1-0
W
2026-10-24 · ESTC-Mohler/Wolfe · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Katie Clawson
loading the estimate
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-09-25 · ESTC-Mohler/Wolfe · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Katie Clawson
loading the estimate
7-5, 6-4
W
2026-06-27 · S OR-ESTC-Mohler · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Katie Clawson championship
loading the estimate
7-6, 6-3
W
2026-06-26 · S OR-ESTC-Mohler · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Katie Clawson championship
loading the estimate
7-5, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-05-03 · ESTC-Mohler · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jody Rolnick
loading the estimate
3-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2026-05-02 · ESTC-Mohler · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Brenda Nulty
loading the estimate
6-1, 7-5
L
2026-05-02 · ESTC-Mohler · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jennifer Yamamoto
loading the estimate
3-6, 1-6
W
2025-11-23 · ESTC-Waples/Martes · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Christina Spencer
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-4
W
2025-11-09 · ESTC-Waples/Martes · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Christina Spencer
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 6-1
L
2025-11-08 · ESTC-Waples/Martes · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Christina Spencer
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2025-11-02 · S OR-ESTC-Mohler · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Kathy Gates
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
7-5, 3-6, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams21 teams · 2019–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
4.0
50%
5W–5L · 50.3% of games
7.0
62.5%
5W–3L · 61.7% of games
8.0
68.9%
31W–14L · 55.9% of games
8.0mixed
58.3%
7W–5L · 51.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 41% of the time
#3 Doubles
41%
31 matches
#2 Doubles
32%
24 matches
#1 Doubles
27%
20 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I don’t want to be somebody else. I want to be myself and win in my way.
Rafael Nadal