← Search

Christina Spencer

Springfield, OR
3.0C year-end 2025
159 matches · 77W–82L · seasons 2019–2026
Bump probability
2.53.03.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.03
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 19 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 2.5
34%
stay 3.0
66%
up to 3.5
Projected to December: 0% down · 76% stay · 24% up, from a year-end estimate of 2.94. Lower than today’s 3.03 because form regresses — players this far above their band partway through a season have historically finished nearer the middle of it. Keep playing at this level and the numbers above are the ones that hold.

A 3.0 runs from 2.51 to 3.00. This rating sits in the top of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
OR · 3.0
107 of 600

Christina is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Christina has been 3.0 for all 7 seasons on record, but moved a long way inside it — from the bottom of the band to the top.

2.53.02019202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 3.0, Christina has gone from the 47th to the 58th percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level6 levels played
3.0
67.8%
40W–19L · 55.4% of games
3.5
20%
2W–8L · 37.8% of games
6.0
22.2%
2W–7L · 45.5% of games
7.0
60%
12W–8L · 54.2% of games
6.0mixed
62.5%
5W–3L · 55.9% of games
7.0mixed
40%
12W–18L · 48.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history159 matches
W
Leslie Deenihan / Katharine Lemcke
2026-05-31 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Wendy Laing
−0.024below expectation — took 57% of games against 64% expected
7-6, 6-4
L
Courtney Munther / Jennifer Ablow
2026-05-30 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Cathleen Karcher
−0.008about as expected — took 43% of games against 47% expected
7-6, 6-4
W
Allison Walkingshaw / Victoria Milburn
2026-05-09 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Paula Thompson
+0.012about as expected — took 50% of games against 46% expected
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W
Janelle Leavell / Melissa Buis
2026-05-02 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Wendy Laing
+0.004about as expected — took 41% of games against 43% expected
0-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
Amber White / Laurie Spellman
2026-05-01 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Linda Spero
+0.008about as expected — took 47% of games against 46% expected
2-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
Diana Sandgren / Lynne Ewald
2026-04-26 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Keri Pape
−0.035below expectation — took 45% of games against 59% expected
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W
Tracey Moore / Diane Walker
2026-04-25 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Keri Pape
+0.017better than expected — took 63% of games against 54% expected
6-4, 6-3
W
Kimberly Schor / Sudha Rajendran
2026-04-04 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Cathleen Karcher
+0.009about as expected — took 55% of games against 51% expected
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W
Laura Moir / Kris Meyer Dorr
2026-03-29 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Lisa Fischer
−0.007about as expected — took 59% of games against 60% expected
7-6, 6-3
W
Jennifer Johns / Meghan Fletcher
2026-03-08 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Cassi Anderson
+0.068better than expected — took 80% of games against 45% expected
6-1, 6-2
L
Laura Chen / Wei Chen
2026-03-07 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Keri Pape
+0.005about as expected — took 46% of games against 44% expected
6-7, 6-4, 1-0
W
Lisa Adamczyk / Melissa Pohl
2025-11-23 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Sarah Wiggins
+0.051better than expected — took 60% of games against 39% expected
6-4, 6-4
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.