← Search

Jennifer Johns

Salem, OR
3.0C year-end 2025
19 matches · 8W–11L · seasons 2024–2026
Bump probability
2.53.03.5lowhigh
Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely.
i
The dashed lines are the edges of your band. The three shaded areas are exactly the three percentages below — area here is the chance of one outcome for you, not a count of players.
2.65
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 6 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
3%
down to 2.5
97%
stay 3.0
0%
up to 3.5

A 3.0 runs from 2.51 to 3.00. This rating sits in the lower half of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure.
i
scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model. USTA publishes year-end ratings in December, which is when this gets graded against what actually happened.
Where you rank
Salem · 3.0
23 of 23
OR · 3.0
698 of 820
By our estimated rating, not the published level.
i
Jennifer is ranked against players at the same level in the same place. The published level is identical for everyone in a band, so it cannot separate them — our estimate can. Groups smaller than five are not ranked at all, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Jennifer has been a steady 3.0 across all 3 seasons on record.

2.53.0202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history. The smaller, faded points — 2024 — rest on fewer than 5 matches, where the estimate is mostly the level the player was entered at rather than anything they did on court. Read the shape, not the value.

How you rank at your level

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level2 levels played
3.0
25%
3W–9L · 36.9% of games
6.0mixed
80%
4W–1L · 59.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history19 matches
W
2026-07-25 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with David Gutterman
+0.000better than expected — took 71% of games against 58% expected
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-07-24 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with David Gutterman
+0.000better than expected — took 54% of games against 42% expected
7-6, 7-6
W
Barbara Nellor / Jessica Mardock
2026-05-17 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Meghan Fletcher
expectation pending — we're still fetching an opponent's record
7-5, 6-4
L
Brandy Cervantes / Dodie Wilson
2026-03-22 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Meghan Fletcher
expectation pending — we're still fetching an opponent's record
6-3, 6-1
L
2026-03-15 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Meghan Fletcher
+0.028better than expected — took 41% of games against 33% expected
6-3, 7-6
L
Christina Spencer / Cassi Anderson
2026-03-08 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Meghan Fletcher
expectation pending — we're still fetching an opponent's record
6-1, 6-2
W
2025-09-20 · #2 Doubles · with David Gutterman
+0.010about as expected — took 50% of games against 47% expected
2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2025-09-19 · #3 Doubles · with David Gutterman
−0.006below expectation — took 25% of games against 35% expected
6-3, 6-1
L
Cathleen Carr / John Thorbeckmixed
2025-07-20 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with David Gutterman
mixed — doesn't count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W
2025-07-19 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with David Gutterman
+0.000better than expected — took 62% of games against 42% expected
6-3, 7-5
W
Sarah Hall / Tim Ballardmixed
2025-07-18 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with David Gutterman
mixed — doesn't count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 7-5
W
Kara Dokos / Rosa Walker
2025-06-08 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Lauren Lalack
expectation pending — we're still fetching an opponent's record
6-0, 6-1
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.