Search

Jennifer Cox

BEND, OR
3.0C year-end 2024
19 matches · 4W–15L · seasons 20232026
Bump probability
2.53.03.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.24
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 9 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 2.5
0%
stay 3.0
100%
up to 3.5
Projected to December: 0% down · 11% stay · 89% up, from a year-end estimate of 3.10. Lower than today’s 3.24 because form regresses — players this far above their band partway through a season have historically finished nearer the middle of it. Keep playing at this level and the numbers above are the ones that hold.

A 3.0 runs from 2.51 to 3.00. This rating sits in the top of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
OR · 3.0
17 of 600

Jennifer is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Jennifer has been a steady 3.0 across all 3 seasons on record.

2.53.03.5202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history. The smaller, faded points — 2024 — rest on fewer than 5 matches, where the estimate is mostly the level the player was entered at rather than anything they did on court. Read the shape, not the value.

How you rank at your level

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level3 levels played
0.0
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
3.0
18.2%
2W–9L · 32% of games
6.0mixed
40%
2W–3L · 44.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history19 matches
L
Anne Bauer / Jay Brownmixed
2026-07-26 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Jeff Cox
+0.000below expectation — took 48% of games against 61% expected
5-7, 6-4, 1-0
W
Carleen McKillop / ROGER PLANTmixed
2026-07-25 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Jeff Cox
+0.000better than expected — took 50% of games against 41% expected
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L
Jennifer Johns / David Guttermanmixed
2026-07-25 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Matt Wason
+0.000below expectation — took 29% of games against 66% expected
6-3, 6-2
W
Laura Anderson / Jeff Stollemixed
2026-07-24 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Jeff Cox
+0.000better than expected — took 67% of games against 51% expected
6-4, 6-2
L
Susan Berado / Lynne Oldham
2026-06-07 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jennifer Thornton
0.084below expectation — took 25% of games against 63% expected
6-1, 6-3
L
Lisa Fischer / Katie Kinports
2026-05-31 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jessica Watson
0.139below expectation — took 8% of games against 69% expected
6-1, 6-0
L
Ann McQueen / Kristina Powers
2026-05-17 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Laura Murray
0.085below expectation — took 29% of games against 65% expected
6-1, 6-4
L
Anne Bauer
2026-05-16 · #2 Singles · 3.0
0.080below expectation — took 48% of games against 71% expected
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
L
Laura Moir / Kristin Jordan
2026-05-09 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Wendy Hynes
0.125below expectation — took 20% of games against 70% expected
6-2, 6-1
L
Zoe Boger / Kimber Stovesand
2025-10-19 · #1 Female Doubles · 0.0 · with Jessica Watson
0.001about as expected — took 33% of games against 38% expected
6-3
L
Jillian Mcqueen
2025-10-18 · #1 Female Singles · 0.0
0.055below expectation — took 45% of games against 65% expected
6-5
L
Rosalee Hermens
2025-10-18 · #1 Female Singles · 0.0
0.173below expectation — took 0% of games against 71% expected
6-0
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.