← Search

Ling Wu

Edmonds, WA
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
131 matches · 84W–47L · seasons 2019–2027

Captains: add Ling Wu to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history131 matches
W
2026-09-13 · PSC-George · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Camilla George
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3
W
2026-08-09 · HBSQ-Furman · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Philip Laue mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 5-7, 1-0
L
2026-05-30 · HBSQ-One More Shot-Deliganis · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Christina Merten
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
L
2026-04-26 · HBSQ-One More Shot-Deliganis · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Christina Merten
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-7, 0-1
W
2026-02-14 · HBSQ-Net Gain-Huffer · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Joanna Nielsen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
L
2026-01-10 · HBSQ-Net Gain-Huffer · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with KC Mattingly-Nelson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-2, 0-1
W
2025-11-02 · HBSQ-Remix-Kim · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Allen Gwo mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-2
W
2025-11-01 · HBSQ-Let's Go!!! Korch · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Lolly Bates
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
W
2025-10-26 · HBSQ-Let's Go!!! Korch · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Camilla George
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-6
W
2025-10-04 · HBSQ-Remix-Kim · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Allen Gwo mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 7-5
W
2025-09-27 · HBSQ-Let's Go!!! Korch · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Joanna Nielsen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
L
2025-09-20 · HBSQ-Remix-Kim · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Chien Chang mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 3-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams34 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.5
52.4%
11W–10L · 55.4% of games
4.0
33.3%
8W–16L · 50.3% of games
7.0
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
8.0
100%
4W–0L · 65.2% of games
7.0mixed
88%
22W–3L · 60.7% of games
8.0mixed
75%
21W–7L · 59.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 38% of the time
#2 Doubles
38%
50 matches
#3 Doubles
35%
46 matches
#1 Doubles
27%
35 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert