Search

Ling Wu

Edmonds, WA
4.0C year-end 2025
129 matches · 82W–47L · seasons 20192026
Bump probability
3.54.04.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.55
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 10 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
27%
down to 3.5
73%
stay 4.0
0%
up to 4.5
Projected to December: 16% down · 84% stay · 0% up, from a year-end estimate of 3.58. Higher than today’s 3.55 because players this far below their band have historically finished nearer the middle of it.

A 4.0 runs from 3.51 to 4.00. This rating sits in the bottom of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Edmonds · 4.0
9 of 9
WA · 4.0
659 of 782

Ling is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Ling has played at 4.0, 3.5 across 6 seasons — 1 move up and 1 down.

3.03.54.0201920222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history. The smaller, faded points — 2019 — rest on fewer than 5 matches, where the estimate is mostly the level the player was entered at rather than anything they did on court. Read the shape, not the value.

How you rank at your level
At 4.0, Ling has gone from the 17th to the 89th percentile of players at that level, 2022 to 2025.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level6 levels played
3.5
52.4%
11W–10L · 55.4% of games
4.0
33.3%
8W–16L · 50.3% of games
7.0
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
8.0
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
87.5%
21W–3L · 60.6% of games
8.0mixed
75%
21W–7L · 59.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history129 matches
L
Morgan Hunter / Elizabeth Baker
2026-05-30 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Christina Merten
0.021below expectation — took 20% of games against 36% expected
6-2, 6-1
L
2026-04-26 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Christina Merten
+0.008better than expected — took 55% of games against 49% expected
2-6, 7-6, 1-0
W
2026-02-14 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Joanna Nielsen
+0.017better than expected — took 71% of games against 59% expected
6-1, 6-4
L
2026-01-10 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with KC Mattingly-Nelson
0.053below expectation — took 47% of games against 65% expected
6-2, 2-6, 1-0
W
Aditya Iyer / Kimberly Lummixed
2025-11-02 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Allen Gwo
+0.000better than expected — took 71% of games against 56% expected
6-3, 6-2
W
2025-11-01 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Lolly Bates
+0.050better than expected — took 80% of games against 53% expected
6-1, 6-2
W
2025-10-26 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Camilla George
0.042below expectation — took 57% of games against 70% expected
6-4, 7-6
W
Felicia van Pelt / David Wongmixed
2025-10-04 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Allen Gwo
+0.000better than expected — took 62% of games against 46% expected
6-3, 7-5
W
2025-09-27 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Joanna Nielsen
+0.013better than expected — took 63% of games against 56% expected
6-4, 6-3
L
2025-09-20 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Chien Chang
+0.000below expectation — took 29% of games against 42% expected
6-2, 6-3
L
2025-08-16 · #3 Doubles · with Max Genereaux
0.008about as expected — took 40% of games against 45% expected
6-4, 6-4
W
Pam MacDuff / Peter Lindburgmixed
2025-08-10 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Paul Lorring
+0.000about as expected — took 71% of games against 67% expected
6-3, 6-2
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.