← Search

Barb Moe

Medina, WA
3.5C year-end 2025
60 matches · 34W–26L · seasons 2019–2026
Bump probability
3.03.54.0lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.30
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 9 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 3.0
99%
stay 3.5
1%
up to 4.0

A 3.5 runs from 3.01 to 3.50. This rating sits in the upper half of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Medina · 3.5
4 of 5
WA · 3.5
547 of 1209

Barb is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Barb has been a steady 3.5 across all 6 seasons on record.

3.03.5201920212022202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history. The smaller, faded points — 2022 — rest on fewer than 5 matches, where the estimate is mostly the level the player was entered at rather than anything they did on court. Read the shape, not the value.

How you rank at your level
At 3.5, Barb has gone from the 27th to the 63rd percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level4 levels played
3.5
57.4%
27W–20L · 52.5% of games
4.0
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
7.0
62.5%
5W–3L · 50% of games
8.0
0W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history60 matches
W
Jenni Volk / Jaycee Barrett
2026-05-07 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Christine Holm
+0.004about as expected — took 63% of games against 59% expected
6-3, 6-4
W
Stephanie Gauthier / Airi Taniguchi
2026-04-30 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Celia Evans
−0.002about as expected — took 50% of games against 52% expected
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-04-03 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Celia Evans
−0.010about as expected — took 53% of games against 57% expected
2-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-03-28 · #2 Doubles · with Casey Pleas
−0.025about as expected — took 65% of games against 69% expected
7-5, 6-2
L
2026-03-14 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Brigid Britton
+0.001below expectation — took 25% of games against 32% expected
6-3, 6-1
L
2026-02-20 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Erin Coomer
−0.020below expectation — took 38% of games against 48% expected
7-5, 6-3
W
Kristin Gresham / Elke Barras
2026-01-24 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Catherine Loveland
+0.022better than expected — took 63% of games against 52% expected
6-4, 6-3
W
2026-01-03 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Julie Bouscaren
−0.020below expectation — took 59% of games against 65% expected
7-5, 6-4
L
2026-01-02 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Celia Evans
+0.000about as expected — took 39% of games against 41% expected
6-1, 4-6, 1-0
W
2025-05-29 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ann Imus
+0.023better than expected — took 67% of games against 54% expected
6-3, 6-3
L
2025-05-22 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Susan Hurt
−0.041below expectation — took 25% of games against 47% expected
6-1, 6-3
W
Carol Guattare / Anu Ganesan
2025-05-01 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Claudia Huzar
+0.022better than expected — took 86% of games against 66% expected
6-1, 6-1
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.