← Search

Barb Moe

Medina, WA
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
61 matches · 35W–26L · seasons 2019–2027

Captains: add Barb Moe to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history61 matches
W
2026-09-12 · STC-Knox · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Melissa Jones
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
W
2026-05-07 · STC-Simply Smashing-Bouscaren · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Christine Holm
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-04-30 · STC-Simply Smashing-Bouscaren · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Celia Evans
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-04-03 · STC-Simply Smashing-Bouscaren · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Celia Evans
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-03-28 · #2 Doubles · with Casey Pleas championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-2
L
2026-03-14 · STC-Rodden · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Brigid Britton
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
L
2026-02-20 · STC-Bouscaren · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Erin Coomer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 3-6
W
2026-01-24 · STC-Bouscaren · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Catherine Loveland
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
W
2026-01-03 · STC-Bouscaren · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Julie Bouscaren
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-4
L
2026-01-02 · STC-Rodden · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Celia Evans
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2025-05-29 · BC-Tennis til Cocktails-Hancock/Johnson · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ann Imus
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
L
2025-05-22 · BC-Tennis til Cocktails-Hancock/Johnson · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Susan Hurt
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams19 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.5
57.4%
27W–20L · 52.5% of games
4.0
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
7.0
62.5%
5W–3L · 50% of games
8.0
1W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 57% of the time
#1 Doubles
57%
35 matches
#2 Doubles
23%
14 matches
#3 Doubles
18%
11 matches
#2 Singles
2%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Tennis is mostly mental. You win or lose the match before you even go out there.
Venus Williams