Teams

STC-Bouscaren

2026 Adult 40 & Over · 3.5 Women

21 players · average NTRP 3.47 / NORTHWEST WASHINGTON

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-03-08vs BC-Slay Sisters-McCulloughWon 31
W#1 DoublesJulie Bouscaren / Molly Fort vs Amy McCullough / AliceJane Brush7-6, 6-0
L#1 SinglesCassandra Johnston vs Haruka Jones3-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesCatherine Davidson / Christine Holm vs Carolina DeHaan / Mari Moline6-3, 6-0
W#3 DoublesErin Coomer / Kate Bayley vs Annika Andrews / Lisa Tillman6-1, 6-7, 1-0
2026-03-01vs TCSP-Margoles/AllenWon 31
W#1 DoublesAlexa Helsell McIntyre / Lara Wagner vs Jenni Volk / Honey Phillips6-2, 6-2
W#1 SinglesMolly Fort vs Lindsay Swanson6-4, 7-5
W#2 DoublesCasey Pleas / J Weed vs Amy Allen / Sandy Margoles4-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#3 DoublesChristine Holm / Kate Bayley vs Liesel Schilperoort / Megan Lafountaine3-6, 7-5, 1-0
2026-02-20vs EDG-#SquadGoals-To/NgSplit 22
L#1 DoublesCelia Evans / Courtney Williams vs Shauna Forster / Angela Hei3-6, 3-6
W#1 SinglesCatherine Davidson vs Gunjan Tykodi6-1, 6-0
L#2 DoublesErin Coomer / Barb Moe vs Chauntelle Johnson / Soojin To5-7, 3-6
W#3 DoublesKatie Misiewicz / Mary Fitzgerald vs Tomomi Gao / Edna Kainz6-4, 6-3
2026-02-06vs NTC-Team Swoop-GrahamWon 31
L#1 DoublesJulie Bouscaren / Katie Misiewicz vs Pam MacDuff / Megan Hill6-4, 1-6, 0-1
W#1 SinglesMolly Fort vs Mikhaila Reudink6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesErin Coomer / Alexa Helsell McIntyre vs Monica Blum / Andrea Petzel5-7, 6-4, 1-0
W#3 DoublesMary Battison / Julie Blume vs Jean Bryant / Natalie Thompson6-4, 6-3
2026-01-31vs CP-Queens of the Court-ChinnWon 31
W#1 DoublesCourtney Williams / Catherine Davidson vs Cherry Ching / Tina Chinn4-6, 6-1, 1-0
L#1 SinglesMolly Fort vs Deb Nielsen6-3, 2-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesJulie Bouscaren / Lara Wagner vs Mary Pope / Priyanka Joshi6-1, 6-3
W#3 DoublesCassandra Johnston / Casey Pleas vs Chrissy Bauer / Miaomiao Zhang6-4, 6-4
2026-01-24vs BELL-GigotWon 31
W#1 DoublesCelia Evans / Courtney Williams vs Jena Wahl / Melissa Stratman7-5, 6-1
W#1 SinglesMolly Fort vs Andria Bronson6-1, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesMary Fitzgerald / Julie Blume vs Kristina Dirks / Angie Harwood5-7, 7-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesCatherine Loveland / Barb Moe vs Kristin Gresham / Elke Barras6-4, 6-3
2026-01-11vs RBW-Symphony#5-ChanWon 40
W#1 DoublesCasey Pleas / Celia Evans vs May-Jun Chao / Meg Lin6-3, 6-4
W#1 SinglesMolly Fort vs Oxana Aelion6-2, 6-4
W#2 DoublesMary Fitzgerald / Katie Misiewicz vs Jodi Dansereau / Joan Harkins6-3, 6-4
W#3 DoublesCatherine Davidson / Mary Battison vs Kate Kennedy / Joanne Yu6-3, 6-3
2026-01-03vs WSC-LOVE ALL-WhitneySplit 22
W#1 DoublesJulie Bouscaren / Barb Moe vs Tanya Vail / Siobhan Whitney7-5, 6-4
W#1 SinglesAlexa Helsell McIntyre vs Laura Borner6-2, 6-4
L#2 DoublesCourtney Williams / Erin Coomer vs Madalena McAllen / Christine Boyle2-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesCatherine Loveland / Julie Blume vs Lisa Mackey / Smaranda Lieuallen3-6, 6-4, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.23 estimated across 19 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.40
Molly Fort
usually #1 Singles 78%, also #3 Doubles 11% · published 3.5
3.35
Julie Blume
usually #3 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
3.33
Lara Wagner
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.31
Christine Holm
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.31
Cassandra Johnston
usually #1 Singles 38%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.29
Julie Bouscaren
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.28
Mary Fitzgerald
usually #3 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published 3.5
3.27
Celia Evans
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.26
Alexa Helsell McIntyre
usually #1 Singles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Catherine Loveland
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.24
Alison Winfield
published 3.5
3.23
Catherine Davidson
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.23
Barb Moe
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.21
Casey Pleas
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.13
Mary Battison
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.13
J Weed
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.12
Katie Misiewicz
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
3.10
Erin Coomer
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.07
Courtney Williams
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.02
Kate Bayley
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Kimberlee Baker
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Courtney Williams + Erin Coomer10261% games+16.9% vs expected
Mary Fitzgerald + Katie Misiewicz5066% games+16.7% vs expected
Alexa Helsell McIntyre + Katie Misiewicz4169% games+15.0% vs expected
Courtney Williams + Christine Holm18362% games+11.8% vs expected
Erin Coomer + Alexa Helsell McIntyre4163% games+10.0% vs expected
Erin Coomer + Katie Misiewicz10163% games+9.1% vs expected
Courtney Williams + Alexa Helsell McIntyre5059% games+7.2% vs expected
Julie Bouscaren + Lara Wagner6263% games+6.1% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Molly Fort
94W–124L career · 9 lines in 2026
<1%77%23%
3.40
3.5
Julie Blume
37W–39L career · 7 lines in 2026
1%86%14%
3.35
3.5
Lara Wagner
27W–11L career · type A · 2 lines in 2026
1%87%12%
3.33
3.5
Christine Holm
35W–10L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%90%9%
3.31
3.5
Cassandra Johnston
92W–76L career · 8 lines in 2026
1%90%9%
3.31
3.5
Julie Bouscaren
40W–52L career · 4 lines in 2026
2%92%6%
3.29
3.5
Mary Fitzgerald
18W–22L career · 7 lines in 2026
2%92%5%
3.28
3.5
Celia Evans
39W–20L career · 5 lines in 2026
3%92%5%
3.27
3.5
Alexa Helsell McIntyre
58W–28L career · type A · 3 lines in 2026
3%92%4%
3.26
3.5
Catherine Loveland
3W–5L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
3.5
Alison Winfield
63W–56L career · no lines in 2026
4%93%3%
3.24
3.5
Catherine Davidson
42W–34L career · 8 lines in 2026
5%92%3%
3.23
3.5
Barb Moe
34W–26L career · 5 lines in 2026
5%92%2%
3.23
3.5
Casey Pleas
7W–6L career · type S · 3 lines in 2026
6%92%2%
3.21
3.5
Mary Battison
17W–26L career · 2 lines in 2026
17%83%<1%
3.13
J Weed
13W–15L career · 1 line in 2026
18%81%<1%
3.13
3
Katie Misiewicz
72W–24L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%19%81%
3.12
3.5
Erin Coomer
58W–37L career · type A · 4 lines in 2026
24%76%<1%
3.10
3.5
Courtney Williams
55W–24L career · 4 lines in 2026
31%69%<1%
3.07
Kate Bayley
36W–17L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%45%55%
3.02
Kimberlee Baker
41W–13L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.