← Search

Shelley Chapman

Issaquah, WA
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
225 matches · 123W–102L · seasons 2019–2027

Captains: add Shelley Chapman to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history225 matches
W
2026-09-13 · EDG-Waltz · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Helen Omand
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-09-12 · EDG-Rittenhouse · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Helen Omand
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-2
L
2026-08-08 · #3 Doubles · with Kyoko Imai championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 7-5, 0-1
L
2026-08-07 · #1 Singles championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
W
2026-07-27 · Four the Fun of it · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Laurie Garay
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-07-23 · Four the Fun of it · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kyoko Imai
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-06-25 · Four the Fun of it · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Anne Wilson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
L
2026-06-21 · #1 Doubles · with Laurie Garay championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
W
2026-06-05 · NWW-EDG-Wilson · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Laurie Garay
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
L
2026-05-01 · NWW-EDG-Wilson · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Laurie Garay
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
W
2026-04-17 · NWW-EDG-Wilson · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
W
2026-04-10 · NWW-EDG-Wilson · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Laurie Garay
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams40 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
3.5
53.8%
21W–18L · 56.1% of games
4.0
50%
42W–42L · 51.6% of games
7.0
100%
11W–0L · 64.6% of games
8.0
54.5%
12W–10L · 54.5% of games
9.0
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
77.8%
7W–2L · 57.3% of games
7.0mixed
62.5%
10W–6L · 55.7% of games
8.0mixed
52.4%
11W–10L · 49.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 31% of the time
#1 Doubles
31%
70 matches
#2 Doubles
24%
55 matches
#3 Doubles
20%
46 matches
#1 Singles
16%
35 matches
#2 Singles
8%
17 matches
#1 Female Singles
1%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer