Search

Kathy McCann

Seattle, WA
4.0C year-end 2025
228 matches · 104W–124L · seasons 20192026
Bump probability
3.54.04.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.48
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 13 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
61%
down to 3.5
39%
stay 4.0
0%
up to 4.5
Projected to December: 38% down · 62% stay · 0% up, from a year-end estimate of 3.53. Higher than today’s 3.48 because players this far below their band have historically finished nearer the middle of it.

A 4.0 runs from 3.51 to 4.00. This rating sits in the bottom of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Seattle · 4.0
172 of 186
WA · 4.0
739 of 782

Kathy is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Kathy has played at 3.5, 4.0 across 7 seasons — 1 move up and 0 down.

3.03.54.02019202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 8.0, Kathy has gone from the 62nd to the 6th percentile of players at that level, 2020 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level6 levels played
3.5
68.2%
15W–7L · 54.6% of games
4.0
30.2%
16W–37L · 44.4% of games
7.0
67.4%
31W–15L · 59.1% of games
8.0
32.2%
19W–40L · 44.9% of games
7.0mixed
50%
8W–8L · 52.6% of games
8.0mixed
25%
2W–6L · 38.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history228 matches
L
2026-07-29 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lori Clithero
0.006below expectation — took 32% of games against 38% expected
7-5, 6-1
L
2026-07-27 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Annelliott Willis
0.042below expectation — took 25% of games against 48% expected
6-2, 6-2
L
Sally Martin / Lyndsey Gillis
2026-07-14 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Julia Pollock
+0.022better than expected — took 45% of games against 37% expected
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-06-16 · #3 Doubles · with Carrie Wies
+0.020better than expected — took 62% of games against 52% expected
6-2, 7-6
W
Bette Mansfield / Joan Harkins
2026-06-11 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Carrie Wies
+0.016better than expected — took 67% of games against 57% expected
6-2, 6-4
W
Susan Thim / Susan Sodorff
2026-06-03 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Carrie Wies
+0.012about as expected — took 50% of games against 46% expected
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
Sandra Schmid / Carrie Morton
2026-03-25 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Julie Vila
0.007about as expected — took 43% of games against 47% expected
6-7, 6-3, 1-0
L
Ashley Matkin / Anita Kamouri
2026-03-18 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Angela Peixotto-Monk
+0.039better than expected — took 57% of games against 39% expected
4-6, 2-2
L
Donna Wrigley / Allyson Marks
2026-02-11 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Venus Velazquez
0.002about as expected — took 38% of games against 41% expected
7-5, 6-3
L
Ann Crampton / Diane Werner
2026-02-02 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Doreen Buchy
0.011below expectation — took 28% of games against 38% expected
6-0, 7-5
L
Cathy Evangelist / Lisa Morgan
2026-01-26 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Maryann Grover
0.044below expectation — took 14% of games against 41% expected
6-1, 6-1
L
2026-01-07 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Liz Enyeart
0.028below expectation — took 14% of games against 36% expected
6-0, 6-2
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.