Search

Jake McRoberts

Kirkland, WA
4.0C year-end 2024
52 matches · 32W–20L · seasons 20212026
Where Jake sits
73
2.5
775
3.0
1278
3.5
930
4.0
419
4.5
77
5.0

Jake is one of 930 men at 4.0 in this cohort of 3552. Levels at or below 4.0 account for 86% of them. Shown for men only: NTRP is a gender-specific standard, so a pooled curve would compare against the wrong bar.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Jake has been 4.0 for all 6 seasons on record, but moved a long way inside it — from the middle of the band to the top.

3.54.0202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history. The smaller, faded points — 2026 — rest on fewer than 5 matches, where the estimate is mostly the level the player was entered at rather than anything they did on court. Read the shape, not the value.

How you rank at your level
At 4.0, Jake has gone from the 39th to the 90th percentile of players at that level, 2021 to 2025.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level4 levels played
4.0
84.6%
22W–4L · 65.4% of games
4.5
12.5%
1W–7L · 44.1% of games
8.0mixed
70%
7W–3L · 57.4% of games
9.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history52 matches
W
2026-05-17 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Tim Mcroberts
0.032below expectation — took 50% of games against 63% expected
7-5, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-05-09 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Tim Mcroberts
+0.008better than expected — took 62% of games against 57% expected
6-3, 7-5
L
Zachary Chalett / Eric Papamarcos
2025-05-17 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Eliot Low
0.042below expectation — took 29% of games against 51% expected
6-3, 6-2
W
Jeff Bahn / Tung Nguyen
2025-04-11 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Eliot Low
+0.020better than expected — took 75% of games against 61% expected
6-2, 6-2
L
Jonathan Newman / Glen Keltonchamps
2025-03-23 · #1 Male Doubles · with Peter Griff
0.038below expectation — took 33% of games against 52% expected
6-3
L
2025-03-22 · #1 Male Doubles · with Peter Griff
0.015below expectation — took 45% of games against 52% expected
6-5
W
2025-03-15 · #1 Male Doubles · 4.0 · with Peter Griff
0.033about as expected — took 75% of games against 78% expected
6-2
W
2025-02-16 · #1 Male Doubles · 4.0 · with Peter Griff
+0.026better than expected — took 75% of games against 59% expected
6-2
W
2025-01-12 · #1 Male Doubles · 4.0 · with Eliot Low
0.007better than expected — took 86% of games against 76% expected
6-1
W
2024-11-09 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Helen Chiang
+0.000below expectation — took 55% of games against 65% expected
6-3, 5-7, 1-0
L
Liang Ming Chen / OLIVER LEImixed
2024-11-02 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Helen Chiang
+0.000below expectation — took 33% of games against 57% expected
6-3, 6-3
W
Tina L Garcia / Aaron Coemixed
2024-10-06 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Helen Chiang
+0.000about as expected — took 52% of games against 53% expected
7-5, 4-6, 1-0
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.