← Search

Jonathan Newman

Seattle, WA
4.0C year-end 2025
56 matches · 39W–17L · seasons 2024–2026
Bump probability
3.54.04.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.78
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 22 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 3.5
100%
stay 4.0
0%
up to 4.5

A 4.0 runs from 3.51 to 4.00. This rating sits in the middle of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Seattle · 4.0
52 of 215
WA · 4.0
199 of 888

Jonathan is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Jonathan has been a steady 4.0 across all 3 seasons on record.

3.54.0202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 4.0, Jonathan has gone from the 78th to the 93rd percentile of players at that level, 2025 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level4 levels played
4.0
77.8%
21W–6L · 60.5% of games
4.5
40%
2W–3L · 41.1% of games
8.0
75%
3W–1L · 57.6% of games
8.0mixed
42.9%
3W–4L · 56.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history56 matches
W
2026-07-27 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Andrew Bagherpour
+0.032better than expected — took 71% of games against 53% expected
6-3, 6-2
L
2026-07-20 · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Raven Thio
−0.029below expectation — took 29% of games against 46% expected
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-07-14 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Felix Schuler
+0.038better than expected — took 63% of games against 45% expected
6-4, 6-3
W
Winthrop Hubbard / William Hubbard
2026-07-12 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Vivek Savsani
+0.010better than expected — took 71% of games against 61% expected
6-3, 6-2
W
Brendon Turnbaugh / Olivia O'Halloranchamps
2026-07-11 · #3 Doubles · with Kylea Gleason
−0.034below expectation — took 47% of games against 62% expected
0-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
Robert Eiland / Kelli Gerischamps
2026-07-10 · #3 Doubles · with Kylea Gleason
+0.005better than expected — took 71% of games against 63% expected
6-1, 6-4
W
2026-06-20 · #1 Doubles · with Bernardo Savitt
+0.010about as expected — took 55% of games against 50% expected
6-3, 5-7, 1-0
W
2026-05-31 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Carson Reed
+0.018better than expected — took 62% of games against 52% expected
7-5, 6-3
W
2026-05-30 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Hans Martin Calle
−0.045below expectation — took 50% of games against 67% expected
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W
Laka Muralidharan / Vaibhav Bora
2026-05-15 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Loren Callahan
−0.002about as expected — took 53% of games against 54% expected
7-6, 3-3
W
2026-05-09 · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Paul Yi
+0.010better than expected — took 62% of games against 56% expected
6-7, 6-1, 1-0
W
Ryan Hung / Victor Hoang
2026-04-25 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Loren Callahan
−0.015about as expected — took 60% of games against 63% expected
6-4, 6-4
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.