Search

Adam Myers

Seattle, WA
4.0C year-end 2025
106 matches · 50W–56L · seasons 20192026
Bump probability
3.54.04.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.59
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 7 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
13%
down to 3.5
87%
stay 4.0
0%
up to 4.5
Projected to December: 8% down · 92% stay · 0% up, from a year-end estimate of 3.61. Higher than today’s 3.59 because players this far below their band have historically finished nearer the middle of it.

A 4.0 runs from 3.51 to 4.00. This rating sits in the bottom of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Seattle · 4.0
130 of 186
WA · 4.0
573 of 782

Adam is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Adam has been 4.0 for all 8 seasons on record, but moved a long way inside it — from the bottom of the band to the middle.

3.54.020192020202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 4.0, Adam has gone from the 53rd to the 12th percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level4 levels played
4.0
51.5%
34W–32L · 52.1% of games
8.0
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
48%
12W–13L · 49.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history106 matches
L
Vivek Savsanichamps
2026-06-13 · #1 Singles
+0.007about as expected — took 40% of games against 39% expected
6-4, 6-4
L
Tim Mcroberts / Jake McRoberts
2026-05-17 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Audley Becker
+0.023better than expected — took 50% of games against 40% expected
7-5, 3-6, 1-0
W
ERIC MORSE
2026-04-25 · #2 Singles · 4.0
+0.095better than expected — took 75% of games against 34% expected
6-1, 6-3
L
2026-03-28 · #2 Singles · 4.0
+0.000below expectation — took 20% of games against 30% expected
6-1, 6-2
L
Jeremy Ong
2026-02-28 · #1 Male Singles · 4.0
0.029below expectation — took 25% of games against 42% expected
6-2
L
Kevin O'Keeffe
2026-01-31 · #1 Male Singles · 4.0
0.042below expectation — took 14% of games against 40% expected
6-1
L
Kareem Kamel
2026-01-18 · #1 Male Singles · 4.0
0.029below expectation — took 14% of games against 36% expected
6-1
L
Lisa Rounds / William Connellychamps
2025-11-08 · #1 Doubles · with Brooke Miller
0.043below expectation — took 29% of games against 51% expected
6-4, 6-1
L
Ian Platouchamps
2025-08-08 · #1 Singles
0.038below expectation — took 25% of games against 46% expected
6-2, 6-2
L
2025-07-12 · #3 Doubles · with Brooke Miller
0.005below expectation — took 35% of games against 40% expected
7-5, 6-2
W
Eric Hagen / Ben Ferrychamps
2025-06-15 · #1 Doubles · with Aaron Miller
+0.013better than expected — took 54% of games against 48% expected
7-6, 7-6
W
Alex Yi / Hans Martin Callechamps
2025-06-07 · #1 Doubles · with Audley Becker
+0.006about as expected — took 56% of games against 53% expected
7-6, 7-5
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.