Search

Mick Jaeger

Issaquah, WA
4.0C year-end 2025
179 matches · 91W–88L · seasons 20192026
Bump probability
3.54.04.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.72
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 16 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 3.5
100%
stay 4.0
0%
up to 4.5

A 4.0 runs from 3.51 to 4.00. This rating sits in the middle of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Issaquah · 4.0
6 of 11
WA · 4.0
305 of 782

Mick is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Mick has played at 4.5, 4.0 across 7 seasons — 0 moves up and 1 down.

3.54.04.52019202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 8.0, Mick has gone from the 54th to the 68th percentile of players at that level, 2024 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level6 levels played
4.0
75%
21W–7L · 57.9% of games
4.5
48.6%
18W–19L · 48.9% of games
8.0
61.8%
21W–13L · 52.2% of games
9.0
57.1%
8W–6L · 50.6% of games
8.0mixed
45.8%
11W–13L · 47.6% of games
9.0mixed
13.3%
2W–13L · 33.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history179 matches
W
2026-07-11 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Maria Recchi
+0.000about as expected — took 67% of games against 67% expected
6-2, 6-4
W
2026-06-27 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Maria Recchi
+0.000better than expected — took 86% of games against 64% expected
6-1, 6-1
L
2026-05-19 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Bruce Dalkin
0.019below expectation — took 41% of games against 50% expected
7-5, 6-4
L
Tom Sloane / John Guevara
2026-05-07 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Bill Zinck
0.019below expectation — took 38% of games against 48% expected
6-3, 7-5
L
Scott Griff / Alex Vitruk
2026-04-18 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Naveen Makkar
0.026below expectation — took 38% of games against 50% expected
6-0, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-04-16 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with William Hubbard
+0.027better than expected — took 75% of games against 58% expected
6-2, 6-2
W
Garry Murayama / Jonathan Poch
2026-04-11 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Wesley Lew
+0.018better than expected — took 67% of games against 56% expected
6-2, 6-4
L
2026-03-29 · #3 Doubles · with Norris Smith
+0.006better than expected — took 56% of games against 51% expected
6-3, 0-6, 1-0
W
2026-03-15 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Glenn Chinn
0.029below expectation — took 47% of games against 60% expected
6-4, 2-6, 1-0
W
Tom Gresham / Jeffrey Haessler
2026-02-21 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Norris Smith
+0.008about as expected — took 58% of games against 54% expected
7-5, 7-5
W
2026-01-25 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Charles Borberg
0.028below expectation — took 44% of games against 58% expected
6-7, 2-3
L
2025-12-06 · #3 Doubles · with Scott Griff
0.017below expectation — took 25% of games against 38% expected
6-4, 6-0
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.