Search

Tessie Decker

MERCER ISLAND, WA
4.5C year-end 2025
174 matches · 94W–80L · seasons 20192026
Bump probability
4.04.55.0lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

4.05
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 24 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
28%
down to 4.0
72%
stay 4.5
0%
up to 5.0
Projected to December: 16% down · 84% stay · 0% up, from a year-end estimate of 4.08. Higher than today’s 4.05 because players this far below their band have historically finished nearer the middle of it.

A 4.5 runs from 4.01 to 4.50. This rating sits in the bottom of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
WA · 4.5
219 of 364

Tessie is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Tessie has been 4.5 for all 8 seasons on record, but moved a long way inside it — from the bottom of the band to the middle.

4.04.520192020202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 4.5, Tessie has gone from the 53rd to the 23rd percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level6 levels played
4.0
78.9%
15W–4L · 61.9% of games
4.5
46.6%
41W–47L · 51.3% of games
5.0
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
65.5%
19W–10L · 55.3% of games
9.0mixed
41.2%
7W–10L · 47.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history174 matches
L
2026-07-19 · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Andrew Ygona
+0.000about as expected — took 40% of games against 39% expected
2-6, 6-0, 1-0
W
2026-07-18 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Adam Holt
+0.000about as expected — took 71% of games against 67% expected
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-07-12 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Adam Holt
+0.000below expectation — took 60% of games against 65% expected
6-4, 6-4
L
2026-07-11 · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Dennis Taylor
+0.000below expectation — took 39% of games against 54% expected
4-6, 6-1, 1-0
L
Natalie Swanson / Denise Zwald
2026-05-31 · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Kristen Glant
+0.049better than expected — took 37% of games against 24% expected
6-3, 6-4
W
Hanh Hoang / Katelyn Hoang
2026-05-17 · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Kerri Hatfield
+0.027better than expected — took 58% of games against 46% expected
6-3, 5-5
L
2026-05-16 · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Huong Pham
0.056below expectation — took 8% of games against 41% expected
6-0, 6-1
L
Terra Yara / Charlayne Espinosa
2026-05-10 · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Shamayal Jawed
0.002about as expected — took 45% of games against 46% expected
5-7, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-04-26 · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Huong Pham
0.018below expectation — took 33% of games against 44% expected
6-4, 6-2
L
2026-04-04 · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Stephanie May
0.047below expectation — took 45% of games against 63% expected
6-4, 5-5
W
2026-03-13 · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Stephanie May
0.023below expectation — took 44% of games against 56% expected
6-4, 1-6, 1-0
L
Kim Evans / Tatyana Keney
2026-03-08 · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Huong Pham
0.017below expectation — took 37% of games against 46% expected
6-3, 6-4
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.