← Search

Julie Keeler

Mercer Island, WA
4.5C year-end 2025
88 matches · 36W–52L · seasons 2019–2026
Bump probability
4.04.55.0lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

4.01
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 10 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
44%
down to 4.0
56%
stay 4.5
0%
up to 5.0
Projected to December: 26% down · 74% stay · 0% up, from a year-end estimate of 4.05. Higher than today’s 4.01 because players this far below their band have historically finished nearer the middle of it.

A 4.5 runs from 4.01 to 4.50. This rating sits in the bottom of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Mercer Island · 4.5
12 of 17
WA · 4.5
238 of 364

Julie is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Julie has been a steady 4.5 across all 8 seasons on record.

4.04.520192020202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 4.5, Julie has gone from the 39th to the 38th percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level3 levels played
4.5
42.1%
32W–44L · 50.4% of games
8.0mixed
25%
1W–3L · 48.6% of games
9.0mixed
50%
2W–2L · 53.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history88 matches
W
2026-05-09 · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Betsy Hendry
+0.028better than expected — took 71% of games against 55% expected
6-3, 6-2
L
2026-04-19 · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Betsy Hendry
+0.002about as expected — took 56% of games against 52% expected
6-4, 1-6, 1-0
L
2026-04-18 · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Betsy Hendry
+0.030better than expected — took 50% of games against 38% expected
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-04-11 · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Brooke Cordova
+0.018better than expected — took 62% of games against 52% expected
7-5, 6-3
L
2026-03-14 · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Betsy Hendry
−0.059below expectation — took 29% of games against 58% expected
6-2, 6-3
L
Lisa Brougham / Jenifer Diegel
2026-03-08 · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Liz Suver
+0.045better than expected — took 47% of games against 31% expected
6-3, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-02-13 · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Betsy Hendry
−0.033below expectation — took 40% of games against 55% expected
6-4, 6-4
L
2026-02-07 · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Liz Suver
+0.007about as expected — took 41% of games against 40% expected
6-3, 7-6
L
2026-02-01 · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Edie Hall
−0.034below expectation — took 35% of games against 52% expected
7-5, 6-2
L
2026-01-10 · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Brooke Cordova
−0.012below expectation — took 39% of games against 45% expected
4-6, 6-1, 1-0
L
2025-05-03 · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Brooke Cordova
−0.031below expectation — took 25% of games against 43% expected
6-3, 6-1
L
2025-05-02 · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Betsy Hendry
−0.048below expectation — took 48% of games against 64% expected
4-6, 6-4, 1-0
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.