← Teams

STC-The Holmes Team

2025 Adult 18 & Over · 4.5 Women

4 players · average NTRP 4.38 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHWEST WASHINGTON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 4.05 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.20
Lisa Black
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.16
Betsy Hendry
usually #1 Doubles 56%, also #3 Doubles 22% · published 4.5
4.01
Emilee Plank
usually #2 Singles 38%, also #1 Singles 38% · published 4.5
3.81
Lydia Oliger
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
Results25 ties
2026-03-14Won 1–0
W#3 DoublesLisa Black / Alex Rosen vs Jane McQuade / Jim Madsen6-4, 6-1
2026-03-14Won 1–0
W#3 DoublesLisa Black / Alex Rosen vs Anne Luke / Earl Allen6-3, 7-6
2026-03-13Won 1–0
W#3 DoublesLisa Black / Alex Rosen vs Cheryl Hicks / Jonathan Holzman6-4, 6-4
2025-09-21Won 1–0
W#3 DoublesLisa Black / Alex Rosen vs Rebecca Redding / Craig Williams6-2, 6-0
2025-09-21Won 1–0
W#3 DoublesAlex Rosen / Lisa Black vs Wolf Yeigh / Sarah Schodde6-3, 6-4
2025-06-22Lost 0–1
L#1 DoublesBetsy Hendry / Wendy Mounger vs Michelle Leonatti / Shino Hyde6-3, 7-6
2025-06-21Lost 0–1
L#2 DoublesBetsy Hendry / Wendy Mounger vs Andrea Lipper / Michelle Fladebo6-2, 6-2
2025-06-21Won 1–0
W#2 DoublesBetsy Hendry / Susan Barker vs Monique Eldridge / Noriko Satake7-6, 6-4
2025-06-20Won 1–0
W#3 DoublesBetsy Hendry / Wendy Mounger vs Marie Michigami / Lyna Nguyen6-2, 6-2
2025-06-15Lost 0–1
L#3 DoublesAmanda Wagner / Emilee Plank vs Rebecca Yu / Mary Green-Zwemke6-2, 6-2
2025-06-08Lost 0–1
L#3 DoublesEmilee Plank / Hannah Plank vs Yen Ly / Cathrine Olander7-6, 4-5
2025-06-08Lost 0–1
L#2 SinglesEmilee Plank vs Krissy Wyngarden3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2025-05-24Won 1–0
W#2 SinglesEmilee Plank vs Emily Peyser7-6, 6-4
2025-05-11Lost 0–1
L#1 DoublesLydia Oliger / Laurie Furumasu vs Erin Troedson / Amanda Romeu6-1, 6-0
2025-05-04Won 1–0
W#2 SinglesEmilee Plank vs Krissy Wyngarden6-2, 7-5
2025-05-02Split 1–1
L#1 DoublesBetsy Hendry / Julie Keeler vs Kerri Hatfield / Shannon Fosseen4-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#3 DoublesSydney Bloch / Emilee Plank vs Shamayal Jawed / SuHyun Jung6-3, 6-1
2025-04-27Won 1–0
W#3 DoublesBetsy Hendry / Julie Keeler vs Kaci Okumoto / Whitney Henderson6-4, 6-4
2025-04-26Lost 0–1
L#1 DoublesBetsy Hendry / Liz Suver vs Diana Nickel / Kaci Okumoto6-4, 2-6, 1-0
2025-04-26Won 1–0
W#2 SinglesEmilee Plank vs Malia Ford6-2, 6-0
2025-04-26Lost 0–1
L#1 SinglesEmilee Plank vs Erica Lee6-0, 6-1
2025-04-19Won 1–0
W#2 SinglesEmilee Plank vs Kazuki Tanaka6-2, 6-1
2025-04-13Lost 0–1
L#1 SinglesEmilee Plank vs Tara Hendrickson6-1, 7-6
2025-04-12Split 1–1
W#1 DoublesBetsy Hendry / Ashleigh Dickinson vs Courtney Stiefel / Janine VanderWhitte6-0, 6-2
L#2 DoublesLaurie Furumasu / Lydia Oliger vs Elizabeth Kellison / Chutimont Blacksmith6-3, 6-4
2025-04-12Lost 0–1
L#3 DoublesSarah Kochis / Emilee Plank vs Lisa Handley / Stephanie Leeding6-3, 6-2
2025-03-29Lost 0–1
L#1 DoublesBetsy Hendry / Julie Keeler vs Rebecca Chen / Priscilla McAughan6-2, 2-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

4.5
Lisa Black
85W–38L career
1%98%1%
4.20
4.5
Betsy Hendry
55W–35L career
1%98%0%
4.16
4.5
Emilee Plank
74W–48L career
12%88%0%
4.01
4
Lydia Oliger
18W–28L career
2%93%5%
3.81

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.