← Search

Liz Suver

Seattle, WA
4.5C year-end 2025
187 matches · 100W–87L · seasons 2019–2026
Bump probability
4.04.55.0lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.88
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 14 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
93%
down to 4.0
7%
stay 4.5
0%
up to 5.0
Projected to December: 72% down · 28% stay · 0% up, from a year-end estimate of 3.95. Higher than today’s 3.88 because players this far below their band have historically finished nearer the middle of it.

A 4.5 runs from 4.01 to 4.50. This rating sits in the bottom of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Seattle · 4.5
92 of 103
WA · 4.5
335 of 364

Liz is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Liz has been a steady 4.5 across all 8 seasons on record.

4.04.520192020202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 4.5, Liz has gone from the 41st to the 55th percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level5 levels played
4.5
50%
48W–48L · 49.1% of games
5.0
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
9.0
44.4%
12W–15L · 50% of games
8.0mixed
72.2%
13W–5L · 58.4% of games
9.0mixed
57.1%
8W–6L · 56.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history187 matches
W
2026-07-19 · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Alex Rosen
+0.000about as expected — took 50% of games against 50% expected
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W
2026-06-26 · #3 Doubles · with Anne Medzegian
+0.038better than expected — took 100% of games against 69% expected
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-05-09 · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Kate Scher
+0.048better than expected — took 62% of games against 41% expected
7-5, 6-3
W
2026-04-18 · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Kate Scher
+0.007about as expected — took 53% of games against 50% expected
3-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
Elynn Wu / Florence Stahura
2026-03-29 · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Betsy Hendry
−0.059below expectation — took 14% of games against 47% expected
6-0, 6-2
L
Michelle Chapple / Daniel Gongchamps
2026-03-14 · #3 Doubles · with Carl Swanson
−0.029below expectation — took 35% of games against 50% expected
6-2, 7-5
L
Lisa Brougham / Jenifer Diegel
2026-03-08 · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Julie Keeler
+0.045better than expected — took 47% of games against 31% expected
6-3, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-02-21 · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Ashleigh Dickinson
+0.007about as expected — took 50% of games against 46% expected
4-6, 7-6, 1-0
L
2026-02-07 · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Julie Keeler
+0.007about as expected — took 41% of games against 40% expected
6-3, 7-6
W
2026-02-01 · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Mindy Blakeslee
+0.032better than expected — took 80% of games against 60% expected
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-01-17 · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Ashleigh Dickinson
−0.018about as expected — took 63% of games against 66% expected
6-0, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-01-10 · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Edie Hall
+0.001about as expected — took 53% of games against 53% expected
6-3, 3-6, 1-0
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.