Search

Katie McRoberts

Kirkland, WA
4.5C year-end 2025
87 matches · 55W–32L · seasons 20212026
Bump probability
4.04.55.0lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

4.16
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 9 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
2%
down to 4.0
98%
stay 4.5
0%
up to 5.0

A 4.5 runs from 4.01 to 4.50. This rating sits in the lower half of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Kirkland · 4.5
3 of 10
WA · 4.5
120 of 364

Katie is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Katie has been a steady 4.5 across all 6 seasons on record.

4.04.5202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 4.5, Katie has gone from the 42nd to the 82nd percentile of players at that level, 2021 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level3 levels played
4.5
64.9%
50W–27L · 56.5% of games
8.0mixed
57.1%
4W–3L · 50% of games
9.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history87 matches
W
2026-07-16 · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Teresa Morrow
+0.020better than expected — took 71% of games against 58% expected
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-07-10 · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Teresa Morrow
0.001better than expected — took 71% of games against 65% expected
6-4, 6-1
L
2026-06-29 · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Teresa Morrow
0.039below expectation — took 45% of games against 60% expected
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-06-11 · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Teresa Morrow
+0.022better than expected — took 75% of games against 60% expected
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-06-07 · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Lydia Sun
0.008about as expected — took 60% of games against 61% expected
6-4, 6-4
W
2026-05-30 · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Lydia Sun
+0.003about as expected — took 65% of games against 60% expected
7-5, 6-2
L
2026-04-25 · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Lydia Sun
0.021below expectation — took 45% of games against 54% expected
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-04-18 · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Akiko Suzuki
0.030below expectation — took 50% of games against 62% expected
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-04-12 · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Lydia Sun
0.034below expectation — took 60% of games against 69% expected
6-3, 6-5
L
Jessica Wang / Yixuan Yang
2025-07-23 · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Pia Westen
+0.009better than expected — took 56% of games against 49% expected
6-4, 1-6, 1-0
W
Felicia van Pelt / Anna Zhang
2025-07-13 · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Pia Westen
0.018about as expected — took 59% of games against 64% expected
6-4, 7-5
L
Ellie Chapman / Shamayal Jawed
2025-07-09 · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Pia Westen
0.010about as expected — took 43% of games against 48% expected
6-7, 6-3, 1-0
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.