Schedule6 played
i
Flight standings25 teams · 4.5 Women
| Team | W | L | Sets lost | Games lost |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1NWW-Kresken | 6 | 0 | 0 | 28 |
| 2Eichenlaub | 6 | 0 | 3 | 47 |
| 34 Aces (Flexible) | 5 | 1 | 3 | 50 |
| 4NWW-Okumoto | 4 | 1 | 2 | 30 |
| 5NWW-Hyde | 4 | 1 | 3 | 37 |
| 6Let’s Get Racket | 4 | 1 | 5 | 53 |
| 7Double trouble | 4 | 2 | 4 | 34 |
| 8Levine | 4 | 2 | 5 | 56 |
| 9McWesten | 3 | 2 | 4 | 38 |
| 10Bean and Sonics | 3 | 2 | 5 | 46 |
| 11Leonatti | 3 | 2 | 6 | 44 |
| 12TEAM SUSHEE (Flexible) | 3 | 2 | 6 | 45 |
| 13Nguyen-Chen | 3 | 3 | 7 | 59 |
| 14Twinners | 3 | 3 | 8 | 68 |
| 15Yeh-Bloch | 3 | 3 | 9 | 68 |
| 16shapira | 2 | 3 | 7 | 55 |
| 17Double Trouble Fun and Bubbles | 2 | 3 | 7 | 53 |
| 18Sia | 2 | 4 | 8 | 51 |
| 19Sure Shots | 2 | 4 | 9 | 65 |
| 204k | 1 | 5 | 10 | 63 |
| 21Beta | 1 | 5 | 10 | 67 |
| 22Team Ziggy | 1 | 5 | 10 | 64 |
| 23fuzzy dunlop | 1 | 5 | 11 | 66 |
| 24Summer Smashers (Flexible) | 0 | 5 | 10 | 60 |
| 25Moms night out | 0 | 5 | 10 | 56 |
Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.
ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays
Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.
Roster averages 4.05 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.
Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.
| Dana Campbell Traywick + Janine VanderWhitte | 3–3 | 55% games | +10.0% vs expected |
| Elizabeth Fletcher + Courtney Stiefel | 6–4 | 55% games | +6.2% vs expected |
| Janine VanderWhitte + Elizabeth Fletcher | 2–8 | 46% games | −0.9% vs expected |
| Janine VanderWhitte + Courtney Stiefel | 5–3 | 55% games | −2.8% vs expected |
| Dana Campbell Traywick + Kimberly Burton | 2–2 | 4 matches | not enough data |
| Jenny Dire + Elizabeth Fletcher | 3–1 | 4 matches | not enough data |
Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.
Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.
Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.