Teams

NWW-Okumoto

2025 One Doubles · 4.5 Women

4 players · average NTRP 4.62 / NORTHWEST WASHINGTON

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2025-07-23vs Summer Smashers (Flexible)Won 10
W#1 DoublesKaci Okumoto / Makenzie Kinloch vs Angie Moawad / Lisa Debiec6-1, 6-0
2025-07-21vs No Strings AttachedWon 10
W#1 DoublesKaci Okumoto / Anh Lao vs Madeline Thiesse / Alicia Miller6-4, 6-2
2025-07-09vs shapiraWon 10
W#1 DoublesAnh Lao / Whitney Henderson vs Molly Klein / Emily Pelosi6-2, 6-4
2025-06-30vs LeonattiWon 10
W#1 DoublesMakenzie Kinloch / Whitney Henderson vs Karen Baebler / Kimberly Aigner6-3, 6-1
2025-06-11vs NWW-HydeLost 01
L#1 DoublesMakenzie Kinloch / Whitney Henderson vs Anna Qiu / Divya Manohar7-6, 3-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings25 teams · 4.5 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1NWW-Kresken6060028
2Eichenlaub6060347
34 Aces (Flexible)5151350
4NWW-Okumoto4141230
5NWW-Hyde4141337
6Let’s Get Racket4141553
7Double trouble4242434
8Levine4242556
9McWesten3232438
10Bean and Sonics3232546
11Leonatti3232644
12TEAM SUSHEE (Flexible)3232645
13Nguyen-Chen3333759
14Twinners3333868
15Yeh-Bloch3333968
16shapira2323755
17Double Trouble Fun and Bubbles2323753
18Sia2424851
19Sure Shots2424965
204k15151063
21Beta15151067
22Team Ziggy15151064
23fuzzy dunlop15151166
24Summer Smashers (Flexible)05051060
25Moms night out05051056

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.56 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.76
Whitney Henderson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 5
4.59
Kaci Okumoto
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.49
Makenzie Kinloch
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.42
Anh Lao
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kaci Okumoto + Makenzie Kinloch7170% games+16.9% vs expected
Anh Lao + Whitney Henderson11265% games+12.1% vs expected
Makenzie Kinloch + Whitney Henderson3256% games+7.4% vs expected
Kaci Okumoto + Anh Lao221358% games+2.8% vs expected
Kaci Okumoto + Whitney Henderson314 matchesnot enough data
Makenzie Kinloch + Anh Lao123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Whitney Henderson
104W–43L career · 3 lines in 2025
no projection at this level
4.76
4.5
Kaci Okumoto
138W–68L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%26%74%
4.59
4.5
Makenzie Kinloch
48W–31L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%53%47%
4.49
4.5
Anh Lao
191W–79L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%72%28%
4.42

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.