Search

Lauren Hummel

Seattle, WA
5.0C year-end 2025
41 matches · 18W–23L · seasons 20252026
Where Lauren sits
176
2.5
1468
3.0
1702
3.5
1076
4.0
441
4.5
72
5.0

Lauren is one of 72 women at 5.0 in this cohort of 4935. Levels at or below 5.0 account for 100% of them. Shown for women only: NTRP is a gender-specific standard, so a pooled curve would compare against the wrong bar.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Lauren has been a steady 5.0 across all 2 seasons on record.

4.55.020252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 5.0, Lauren has gone from the 54th to the 37th percentile of players at that level, 2025 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level3 levels played
5.0
50%
13W–13L · 50% of games
10.0mixed
20%
1W–4L · 45.5% of games
9.0mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history41 matches
W
2026-07-25 · #1 Doubles · 5.0 · with Lora Edens
+0.004about as expected — took 53% of games against 52% expected
2-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
2026-07-21 · #1 Doubles · 5.0 · with Melisa Biscayno
0.012below expectation — took 20% of games against 34% expected
6-3, 6-0
W
Isabella Wu / Julie Hansen
2026-07-19 · #1 Doubles · 5.0 · with Lora Edens
0.019about as expected — took 75% of games against 73% expected
6-4, 6-0
L
2026-07-12 · #3 Doubles · 10.0 · with Carl Swanson
+0.000about as expected — took 50% of games against 54% expected
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-07-10 · #2 Doubles · with Nishaant Limaye
0.059below expectation — took 8% of games against 42% expected
6-1, 6-0
L
2026-06-28 · #2 Doubles · 10.0 · with Winston McClanahan
+0.000about as expected — took 38% of games against 36% expected
6-2, 7-6
L
Elysa Kohrs / Sara Jandova
2026-05-30 · #2 Doubles · 5.0 · with Vanessa Nommensen
0.017below expectation — took 20% of games against 35% expected
6-1, 6-2
L
2026-05-17 · #2 Doubles · 5.0 · with Vanessa Nommensen
0.038below expectation — took 50% of games against 63% expected
7-6, 5-7, 1-0
L
2026-05-15 · #2 Doubles · 5.0 · with Jodie Wise
0.033below expectation — took 37% of games against 53% expected
6-3, 6-4
W
Danielle Enright / Makenzie Kinloch
2026-05-03 · #2 Doubles · 5.0 · with Nancy Daly
+0.031better than expected — took 75% of games against 57% expected
6-0, 6-4
W
2026-04-19 · #2 Doubles · 5.0 · with Lauren DiFazio
+0.009about as expected — took 52% of games against 49% expected
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W
Emily Pelosi / Elise Johnson
2026-04-17 · #2 Doubles · 5.0 · with Lisa Black
+0.062better than expected — took 80% of games against 48% expected
6-1, 6-2
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.