← Search

Cassia Carpio

Beaverton, OR
4.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
348 matches · 257W–91L · seasons 2019–2027

Captains: add Cassia Carpio to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history348 matches
W
2026-09-11 · LOTC-Ferrer/Berkman · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Andy Bracken mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-2
L
2026-08-01 · WHRC-Green-Zwemke/Pham · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Charles Taguet mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-07-31 · WHRC-Green-Zwemke/Pham · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Leo Keppinger mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-07-26 · LOTC-Green-Zwemke/Carpio · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Peter Johnson mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-07-25 · LOTC-Green-Zwemke/Carpio · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Neville Mehta mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 4-6
W
2026-07-18 · LOTC-Green-Zwemke/Carpio · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Neville Mehta mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 6-4
L
2026-07-18 · WHRC-Green-Zwemke/Pham · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Craig Williams mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 3-6
W
2026-07-15 · LOTC-Green-Zwemke/Carpio · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Peter Johnson mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-07-11 · #1 Doubles · with Clinton Young championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-5, 1-0
W
2026-07-10 · #3 Doubles · with Matt Simmering championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
W
2026-06-21 · WHRC-Green-Zwemke/Pham · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Leo Keppinger mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-3
L
2026-06-20 · #1 Doubles · with Tara Heikila championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 3-6, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams65 teams · 2016–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
0.0
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
3.0
100%
12W–0L · 74.9% of games
3.5
76.7%
23W–7L · 62.3% of games
4.0
75.4%
46W–15L · 62.5% of games
4.5
65.8%
25W–13L · 55.7% of games
6.0mixed
100%
14W–0L · 70.8% of games
7.0mixed
75.9%
22W–7L · 61.1% of games
8.0mixed
80.7%
46W–11L · 61.7% of games
9.0mixed
63.9%
23W–13L · 54.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 42% of the time
#1 Doubles
42%
147 matches
#2 Doubles
30%
104 matches
#3 Doubles
19%
67 matches
#1 Singles
7%
24 matches
#2 Singles
2%
6 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Experience is a big word. I think it comes with time, and I have that.
Serena Williams