← Search

Amanda Yaris

Beaverton, OR
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
68 matches · 45W–23L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add Amanda Yaris to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history68 matches
W
2026-07-23 · NOR-Becker · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Charlotte Clarke
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-4
L
2026-07-02 · NOR-Becker · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Miki Han
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 2-6
W
2026-06-28 · NOR-Becker · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jessica Becker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-06-27 · NOR-Becker · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jessica Becker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 5-2
L
2026-06-20 · #2 Singles championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-06-19 · #2 Doubles · with Ying-Chieh Chen championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-6, 0-1
L
2026-06-06 · NOR-THPRD-Agrawal · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ying-Chieh Chen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-05-30 · NOR-THPRD-Agrawal · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-05-17 · NOR-THPRD-Agrawal · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
W
2026-04-26 · NOR-THPRD-Agrawal · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
L
2026-04-24 · NOR-THPRD-Agrawal · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 3-1, 0-1
L
2026-04-19 · NOR-THPRD-Agrawal · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ramya Gotety
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams15 teams · 2024–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.0
88.9%
8W–1L · 73.9% of games
3.5
63.2%
12W–7L · 57.7% of games
6.0mixed
100%
5W–0L · 71.4% of games
7.0mixed
56.2%
9W–7L · 51.3% of games
8.0mixed
75%
3W–1L · 58.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 32% of the time
#1 Doubles
32%
22 matches
#2 Doubles
24%
16 matches
#1 Female Doubles
12%
8 matches
#2 Singles
12%
8 matches
#3 Doubles
10%
7 matches
#2 Mixed Doubles
4%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The moment of victory is much too short to live for that and nothing else.
Martina Navratilova