Search

Cinthia Erickson

Vancouver, WA
3.5C year-end 2025
69 matches · 37W–32L · seasons 20212026
Bump probability
3.03.54.0lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.20
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 18 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
1%
down to 3.0
99%
stay 3.5
0%
up to 4.0

A 3.5 runs from 3.01 to 3.50. This rating sits in the lower half of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Vancouver · 3.5
28 of 39
WA · 3.5
876 of 1209

Cinthia is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Teams12 teams · 2021–2026
CGM-Kropp
2026 Mixed 18 & Over · 7.0 Mixed
2026
THPRD-Yaris/Becker
2026 Coed 18-39 · 7.0 Coed Combo
2026
CGM-Kropp
2026 Adult 18 & Over · 3.5 Women
2026
CGM-Barta/Szueber
2025 Mixed 18 & Over · 6.0 Mixed
2025
CGM-Kropp
2025 Adult 18 & Over · 3.5 Women
2025
CGM-Watson
2024 Adult 18 & Over · 3.0 Women
2024
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Cinthia has played at 3.0, 3.5 across 6 seasons — 1 move up and 0 down.

2.53.03.5202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 3.5, Cinthia has gone from the 14th to the 42nd percentile of players at that level, 2024 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level5 levels played
3.0
57.1%
16W–12L · 55.7% of games
3.5
40.9%
9W–13L · 43.5% of games
7.0
50%
2W–2L · 56.2% of games
6.0mixed
71.4%
5W–2L · 57% of games
7.0mixed
62.5%
5W–3L · 57.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history69 matches
W
Bridget Kaiel
2026-05-23 · CGM-Kropp · #2 Singles · 3.5
+0.034better than expected — took 60% of games against 45% expected
6-4
L
2026-05-17 · CGM-Kropp · #2 Singles · 3.5
0.009below expectation — took 33% of games against 40% expected
6-2, 6-4
L
2026-05-02 · CGM-Kropp · #2 Singles · 3.5
+0.014about as expected — took 42% of games against 38% expected
4-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
Chelsea Smith
2026-04-26 · CGM-Kropp · #1 Singles · 3.5
0.005better than expected — took 75% of games against 69% expected
6-4, 6-0
W
2026-04-25 · CGM-Kropp · #1 Singles · 3.5
+0.009about as expected — took 54% of games against 50% expected
6-4, 6-7, 1-0
L
2026-04-12 · CGM-Kropp · #2 Singles · 3.5
0.030below expectation — took 37% of games against 52% expected
6-4, 6-3
W
Amory-Katelyn Zschach / Skye Larsen
2026-03-01 · THPRD-Yaris/Becker · #1 Female Doubles · 7.0 · with Charlotte Clarke
+0.063better than expected — took 100% of games against 62% expected
6-0
W
2026-01-24 · THPRD-Yaris/Becker · #1 Female Doubles · 7.0 · with Jessica Becker
+0.027better than expected — took 75% of games against 58% expected
6-2
L
2026-01-17 · THPRD-Yaris/Becker · #1 Mixed Doubles · 7.0 · with Ryan Erickson
0.046below expectation — took 25% of games against 49% expected
6-2
L
2026-01-03 · THPRD-Yaris/Becker · #1 Female Doubles · 7.0 · with Charlotte Clarke
0.068below expectation — took 40% of games against 66% expected
6-4
L
2025-11-29 · CGM-Kropp · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Ryan Erickson
+0.000about as expected — took 45% of games against 46% expected
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2025-11-08 · CGM-Kropp · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Ryan Erickson
+0.000better than expected — took 59% of games against 37% expected
3-6, 6-1, 1-0
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.