← Search

Ryan Erickson

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Vancouver, WA
3.0M year-end 2025
i
Mixed Exclusive — this player’s rating comes only from mixed play
18 matches · 8W–10L · seasons 2023–2026
Match history18 matches
L
2026-10-31 · CGM-Kropp/Song · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Cinthia Erickson mixed
loading the estimate
4-6, 2-6
L
2026-10-24 · CGM-Kropp/Song · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Cinthia Erickson mixed
loading the estimate
4-6, 4-6
W
2026-09-19 · CGM-Kropp/Song · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Cinthia Erickson mixed
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-4
L
2026-01-24 · THPRD-Yaris/Becker · #2 Mixed Doubles · 7.0 · with Cinthia Erickson mixed
loading the estimate
1-6
L
2026-01-17 · THPRD-Yaris/Becker · #1 Mixed Doubles · 7.0 · with Cinthia Erickson mixed
loading the estimate
2-6
L
2026-01-03 · THPRD-Yaris/Becker · #1 Male Doubles · 7.0 · with Matthew Kanagandram mixed
loading the estimate
4-6
L
2025-11-29 · CGM-Kropp · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Cinthia Erickson mixed
loading the estimate
6-4, 3-6, 0-1
W
2025-11-08 · CGM-Kropp · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Cinthia Erickson mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 6-1, 1-0
L
2025-10-18 · CGM-Kropp · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Cinthia Erickson mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
7-5, 4-6, 0-1
L
2025-09-28 · CGM-Kropp · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Cinthia Erickson mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-4, 4-6, 0-1
W
2025-09-20 · CGM-Kropp · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Cinthia Erickson mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-1, 6-1
W
2025-09-06 · CGM-Kropp · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Cinthia Erickson mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-4, 7-5
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams5 teams · 2024–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
6.0mixed
66.7%
4W–2L · 58% of games
7.0mixed
33.3%
4W–8L · 49.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 39% of the time
#1 Doubles
39%
7 matches
#2 Doubles
39%
7 matches
#1 Male Doubles
6%
1 match
#1 Mixed Doubles
6%
1 match
#2 Mixed Doubles
6%
1 match
#3 Doubles
6%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.
Arthur Ashe