Search

Rob Laing

Portland, OR
3.5C year-end 2025
82 matches · 29W–53L · seasons 20192026
Bump probability
3.03.54.0lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.19
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 14 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
1%
down to 3.0
99%
stay 3.5
0%
up to 4.0

A 3.5 runs from 3.01 to 3.50. This rating sits in the lower half of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Portland · 3.5
274 of 399
OR · 3.5
520 of 735

Rob is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Teams22 teams · 2018–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Rob has been a steady 3.5 across all 6 seasons on record.

3.03.5201920202022202320252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 3.5, Rob has gone from the 36th to the 30th percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level2 levels played
3.5
43.5%
20W–26L · 48.8% of games
7.0mixed
25.7%
9W–26L · 39.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history82 matches
L
2026-07-05 · VTC-Porter/Griffith · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Ericka Nelson
+0.000about as expected — took 35% of games against 33% expected
6-1, 7-6
W
2026-05-30 · PT&E/SJRC-Simons · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Joseph M Heffernan III
+0.024better than expected — took 67% of games against 54% expected
6-4, 6-2
L
2026-05-02 · PT&E/SJRC-Simons · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with DANIEL WOYTEK
+0.044better than expected — took 59% of games against 38% expected
6-4, 0-6, 1-0
L
2026-04-25 · PT&E/SJRC-Simons · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with J Will Morrison
+0.001about as expected — took 41% of games against 42% expected
6-3, 7-6
L
Jong Bum Park / Yong-Joon Park
2026-02-28 · PT&E/SJRC-Woytek/Laing · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Zachary Horn
0.034below expectation — took 25% of games against 44% expected
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-02-01 · PT&E/SJRC-Woytek/Laing · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Joseph M Heffernan III
0.002about as expected — took 38% of games against 41% expected
6-1, 6-7, 1-0
L
2026-01-24 · PT&E/SJRC-Woytek/Laing · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Peter Katon
0.044below expectation — took 40% of games against 59% expected
6-4, 6-4
W
2026-01-17 · PT&E/SJRC-Woytek/Laing · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Evan Simons
+0.016better than expected — took 50% of games against 44% expected
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-01-11 · PT&E/SJRC-Woytek/Laing · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with J Will Morrison
+0.017better than expected — took 50% of games against 44% expected
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2025-11-23 · PT&E/SJRC-Haas · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Ericka Nelson
+0.000about as expected — took 38% of games against 42% expected
6-2, 7-6
L
2025-11-02 · PT&E/SJRC-Haas · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Ericka Nelson
+0.000below expectation — took 25% of games against 35% expected
6-3, 6-1
L
2025-10-03 · PT&E/SJRC-Haas · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Ericka Nelson
+0.000below expectation — took 25% of games against 46% expected
6-1, 6-3
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.