Search

DANIEL WOYTEK

Portland, OR
3.0C year-end 2025
21 matches · 13W–8L · seasons 20242026
Bump probability
2.53.03.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.31
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 9 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 2.5
0%
stay 3.0
100%
up to 3.5
Projected to December: 0% down · 3% stay · 97% up, from a year-end estimate of 3.15. Lower than today’s 3.31 because form regresses — players this far above their band partway through a season have historically finished nearer the middle of it. Keep playing at this level and the numbers above are the ones that hold.

A 3.0 runs from 2.51 to 3.00. This rating sits in the top of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Portland · 3.0
2 of 357
OR · 3.0
5 of 600

DANIEL is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Teams4 teams · 2024–2026
PT&E/SJRC-Woytek/Laing
2026 Adult 40 & Over · 3.5 Men
2026
PT&E/SJRC-Simons
2026 Adult 18 & Over · 3.5 Men
2026
N OR-PT&E/SJRC-Bollaert
2025 Adult 18 & Over · 3.0 Men
2025
PT&E/SJRC-Bollaert/Bednarz
2024 Adult 18 & Over · 3.0 Men
2024
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

DANIEL has played at 3.0, 3.5 across 3 seasons — 1 move up and 0 down.

2.53.03.5202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history. The smaller, faded points — 2025 — rest on fewer than 5 matches, where the estimate is mostly the level the player was entered at rather than anything they did on court. Read the shape, not the value.

How you rank at your level

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level2 levels played
3.0
66.7%
6W–3L · 60% of games
3.5
44.4%
4W–5L · 50.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history21 matches
L
2026-06-13 · PT&E/SJRC-Simons · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Evan Simons
0.006below expectation — took 29% of games against 37% expected
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-05-10 · PT&E/SJRC-Simons · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Evan Simons
+0.054better than expected — took 71% of games against 44% expected
6-1, 6-4
L
2026-05-02 · PT&E/SJRC-Simons · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Rob Laing
+0.044better than expected — took 59% of games against 38% expected
6-4, 0-6, 1-0
L
2026-04-25 · PT&E/SJRC-Simons · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Nicholas White
+0.014about as expected — took 32% of games against 32% expected
7-5, 6-1
W
Alan Jones / Jean Pierre Belmar
2026-03-21 · PT&E/SJRC-Woytek/Laing · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sam Wallace
+0.042better than expected — took 59% of games against 41% expected
7-5, 6-4
W
Chinwoo Kim / Tae Dong Kim
2026-02-28 · PT&E/SJRC-Woytek/Laing · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Joseph M Heffernan III
+0.056better than expected — took 67% of games against 41% expected
6-4, 6-2
W
David Howard / William Allers
2026-02-01 · PT&E/SJRC-Woytek/Laing · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Evan Simons
+0.023better than expected — took 53% of games against 44% expected
3-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
Gavin Smith / Tuan Phan
2026-01-24 · PT&E/SJRC-Woytek/Laing · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ian Little
0.017below expectation — took 20% of games against 35% expected
6-3, 6-0
L
2026-01-03 · PT&E/SJRC-Woytek/Laing · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Evan Simons
+0.057better than expected — took 57% of games against 33% expected
7-6, 1-6, 1-0
W
Monte Gonzales / Tuan Phanchamps
2025-06-29 · N OR-PT&E/SJRC-Bollaert · #2 Doubles · with Dylan Floyd
+0.046better than expected — took 75% of games against 51% expected
6-2, 6-2
W
Mark Hopkins / Keaton Partch
2025-06-21 · N OR-PT&E/SJRC-Bollaert · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Danny Peter
+0.059better than expected — took 80% of games against 49% expected
6-3, 6-0
W
2025-06-14 · N OR-PT&E/SJRC-Bollaert · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Danny Peter
+0.019better than expected — took 57% of games against 48% expected
6-4, 7-6
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.