← Search

Srinivasa Kanamatha

Portland, OR
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
130 matches · 75W–55L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Srinivasa Kanamatha to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history130 matches
W
2026-07-31 · NOR-THPRD-Shull · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Debbie Spitzer mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-3
L
2026-07-24 · LOTC-Shull · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Kristie Leake mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 5-7
W
2026-07-12 · LOTC-Shull · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Kristie Leake mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 7-5
L
2026-07-10 · NOR-THPRD-Shull · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Shweta Agrawal mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 5-7
W
2026-06-27 · NOR-THPRD-Shull · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Debbie Spitzer mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-0
L
2026-06-14 · NOR-THPRD-Shull · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Shweta Agrawal mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 3-6
W
2026-06-13 · SAC-Ferschweiler · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Matt Zhou
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-06-07 · SAC-Ferschweiler · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Matt Zhou
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
W
2026-05-31 · SAC-Ferschweiler · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Matt Zhou
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-05-10 · SAC-Ferschweiler · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Matt Zhou
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 2-6, 0-1
W
2026-05-01 · SAC-Ferschweiler · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Matt Zhou
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-04-18 · SAC-Ferschweiler · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Matt Zhou
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 7-5
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams33 teams · 2015–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.5
63.4%
45W–26L · 55.3% of games
4.0
38.1%
8W–13L · 45.6% of games
7.0mixed
60.9%
14W–9L · 54.8% of games
8.0mixed
50%
3W–3L · 50% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 69% of the time
#1 Doubles
69%
90 matches
#2 Doubles
16%
21 matches
#3 Doubles
7%
9 matches
#1 Singles
4%
5 matches
#2 Singles
4%
5 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert