Search

Matt Curtis

Portland, OR
3.5C year-end 2025
80 matches · 45W–35L · seasons 20222026
Bump probability
3.03.54.0lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.16
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 18 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
2%
down to 3.0
98%
stay 3.5
0%
up to 4.0

A 3.5 runs from 3.01 to 3.50. This rating sits in the lower half of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Portland · 3.5
296 of 399
OR · 3.5
563 of 735

Matt is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Teams24 teams · 2017–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Matt has played at 3.0, 3.5 across 4 seasons — 1 move up and 0 down.

2.53.03.52022202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level6 levels played
3.0
66.7%
4W–2L · 52.9% of games
3.5
33.3%
5W–10L · 45.8% of games
6.0
75%
6W–2L · 55.5% of games
7.0
63.6%
7W–4L · 58.9% of games
6.0mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
57.1%
16W–12L · 51.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history80 matches
L
2026-07-19 · THPRD-Feng · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Cheryl Roloff
+0.000below expectation — took 33% of games against 50% expected
6-4, 6-2
W
2026-07-18 · THPRD-Feng · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jing Feng
+0.000about as expected — took 63% of games against 62% expected
6-3, 6-4
L
2026-07-12 · Malboeuf · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Bob O'Halloran
+0.013about as expected — took 41% of games against 38% expected
3-6, 6-1, 1-0
L
Eli Galvan / Puntrigar Suriyaseangmixed
2026-07-11 · THPRD-Feng · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Haihua Su
+0.000about as expected — took 44% of games against 46% expected
3-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
Barbara Dusicka / Tuan Phanmixed
2026-06-13 · THPRD-Feng · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Haihua Su
+0.000about as expected — took 29% of games against 30% expected
6-4, 6-1
L
2026-05-16 · MAC-Inkpen · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jesse Inkpen
+0.011about as expected — took 33% of games against 34% expected
6-3, 6-3
W
Mark Hopkins / Julia Henrymixed
2026-05-10 · THPRD-Feng 7.0 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jian Xu
+0.000about as expected — took 65% of games against 62% expected
7-6, 6-1
W
2026-05-08 · THPRD-Feng 7.0 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Karen Pickering
+0.000about as expected — took 48% of games against 49% expected
7-6, 3-6, 1-0
W
Jeff Perry / Suzie Sarkisianmixed
2026-04-19 · THPRD-Feng 7.0 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jing Feng
+0.000better than expected — took 80% of games against 51% expected
6-2, 6-1
L
2026-04-18 · MAC-Inkpen · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Bob O'Halloran
+0.039better than expected — took 44% of games against 31% expected
7-6, 7-5
W
Sam Ko / Tamara Patrickmixed
2026-04-04 · THPRD-Feng 7.0 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jing Feng
+0.000better than expected — took 57% of games against 46% expected
7-6, 6-4
L
2026-04-03 · THPRD-Feng 7.0 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jing Feng
+0.000better than expected — took 40% of games against 33% expected
6-4, 6-4
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.