Search

Julia Henry

West Linn, OR
3.0C year-end 2025
139 matches · 87W–52L · seasons 20192026
Bump probability
2.53.03.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.24
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 28 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 2.5
0%
stay 3.0
100%
up to 3.5
Projected to December: 0% down · 12% stay · 88% up, from a year-end estimate of 3.10. Lower than today’s 3.24 because form regresses — players this far above their band partway through a season have historically finished nearer the middle of it. Keep playing at this level and the numbers above are the ones that hold.

A 3.0 runs from 2.51 to 3.00. This rating sits in the top of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
West Linn · 3.0
1 of 21
OR · 3.0
19 of 600

Julia is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Teams38 teams · 2015–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Julia has been 3.0 for all 8 seasons on record, but moved a long way inside it — from the middle of the band to the top.

2.53.020192020202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 3.0, Julia has gone from the 46th to the 98th percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level5 levels played
3.0
59%
46W–32L · 54.7% of games
3.5
57.1%
12W–9L · 49.5% of games
6.0
100%
5W–0L · 76.2% of games
6.0mixed
70%
14W–6L · 55.8% of games
7.0mixed
75%
6W–2L · 54.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history139 matches
L
2026-07-25 · CRRC-Johnson/Ash · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Ryan Owens
+0.000about as expected — took 41% of games against 38% expected
7-6, 6-3
L
2026-07-12 · CRRC-Ash/Johnson · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Erik Bucher
+0.000about as expected — took 45% of games against 50% expected
5-7, 6-3, 1-0
W
Chris Ryan / Colleen Athertonmixed
2026-06-28 · CRRC-Ash/Johnson · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Matt Savage
+0.000about as expected — took 65% of games against 67% expected
6-0, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-06-14 · CRRC-Johnson/Ash · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Brad Johnson
+0.000better than expected — took 71% of games against 48% expected
6-1, 6-4
W
2026-05-24 · CRRC-Glenn(s) · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Robert Glenn
+0.000better than expected — took 62% of games against 54% expected
7-6, 6-2
W
Katie Morrison / Kheoshi Owens
2026-05-23 · CRRC-Jacobsen/Ash · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Vanessa Weber
0.017about as expected — took 67% of games against 68% expected
6-2, 6-4
W
2026-05-22 · CHARB-Trank/Siri · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jennifer Trank
0.017below expectation — took 47% of games against 56% expected
6-2, 0-6, 1-0
L
2026-05-10 · CRRC-Glenn(s) · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Mark Hopkins
+0.000about as expected — took 35% of games against 38% expected
7-6, 6-1
W
2026-05-09 · CHARB-Trank/Siri · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Karen Groenweghe
+0.021better than expected — took 63% of games against 52% expected
6-4, 6-3
W
Jennie Ehleringer / Jennifer Tadjedin
2026-05-03 · CRRC-Jacobsen/Ash · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with THAO VAN
0.021about as expected — took 71% of games against 71% expected
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-05-02 · CRRC-Jacobsen/Ash · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with THAO VAN
+0.027better than expected — took 75% of games against 59% expected
6-3, 6-1
W
Ana Elizabeth Schaller de la Cova / Molly Tiesenga
2026-04-19 · CHARB-Trank/Siri · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Alma Siri
+0.030better than expected — took 80% of games against 61% expected
6-3, 6-0
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.