← Search

Elicia Putnam

Bend, OR
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
106 matches · 51W–55L · seasons 2020–2026

Captains: add Elicia Putnam to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history106 matches
L
2026-08-15 · #1 Doubles · with SHAWNA THOMPSON championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
W
2026-08-05 · Ace Ace Baby · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with SHAWNA THOMPSON
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-07-27 · Ace Ace Baby · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with SHAWNA THOMPSON
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
W
2026-07-20 · Ace Ace Baby · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Ashley Sajadi
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
L
2026-06-27 · #2 Doubles · with Lisa Mayer championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-5, 1-0
W
2026-06-26 · #3 Doubles · with Jodi Wilkins championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-5
L
2026-05-24 · SHC-Christensen · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jeff Perry mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 2-6
W
2026-05-08 · SHC-Christensen · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Matthew Trank mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 5-7, 1-0
W
2026-04-26 · ACB-DeWolf · #2 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
W
2026-04-25 · ACB-DeWolf · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 7-5
L
2026-04-19 · SHC-Christensen · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Roger Dehoog mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 2-6
L
2026-04-11 · #1 Doubles · with Stephanie Hoover championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 4-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams30 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.0
63%
34W–20L · 57.5% of games
3.5
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
6.0
63.6%
7W–4L · 50.5% of games
7.0
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
13.8%
4W–25L · 33.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 34% of the time
#1 Doubles
34%
36 matches
#2 Doubles
25%
26 matches
#1 Singles
17%
18 matches
#3 Doubles
16%
17 matches
#2 Singles
9%
9 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova