← Search

Steven Keo

Portland, OR
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
89 matches · 45W–44L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Steven Keo to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history89 matches
W
2026-05-20 · #1 Doubles · with Kevin Semonsen championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-0
W
2026-05-08 · THPRD-Feng 7.0 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jian Xu mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-4
W
2026-04-23 · NOR-THPRD-Christensen/Keo · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with James Takahashi
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
W
2026-04-19 · THPRD-Feng 7.0 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Tove Maloco mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-04-11 · THPRD-Feng 7.0 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Karen Pickering mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 6-1
L
2026-04-09 · NOR-THPRD-Christensen/Keo · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with James Takahashi
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 2-6, 0-1
W
2026-03-31 · NOR-THPRD-Christensen/Keo · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Edwin Becker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-03-28 · THPRD-Feng 7.0 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jing Feng mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-4
L
2026-03-24 · NOR-THPRD-Christensen/Keo · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Terence Gariety
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 2-6
L
Rick Jackson / Edward Bradford
2026-01-24 · #3 Doubles · with Dale Christensen championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-7
L
Mike Jurgenson / Mike O'Reilly
2026-01-24 · #2 Doubles · with Terence Gariety championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
L
Pete Zink / John Franta
2026-01-23 · #3 Doubles · with Dale Christensen championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 5-7
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams40 teams · 2013–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.5
100%
4W–0L · 59.5% of games
4.0
28.6%
4W–10L · 37.3% of games
7.0
63.3%
19W–11L · 53.3% of games
8.0
15.4%
2W–11L · 43.7% of games
7.0mixed
54.5%
6W–5L · 58.1% of games
8.0mixed
60%
3W–2L · 54% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 42% of the time
#1 Doubles
42%
37 matches
#3 Doubles
30%
27 matches
#2 Doubles
28%
25 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Start where you are. Use what you have. Do what you can.
Arthur Ashe