← Search

Robert Shevlin

VANCOUVER, WA
3.5C year-end 2025
57 matches · 30W–27L · seasons 2019–2026
Bump probability
3.03.54.0lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.14
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 7 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
4%
down to 3.0
96%
stay 3.5
0%
up to 4.0

A 3.5 runs from 3.01 to 3.50. This rating sits in the lower half of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
VANCOUVER · 3.5
4 of 6
WA · 3.5
1022 of 1209

Robert is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
How you rank at your level
At 7.0, Robert has gone from the 70th to the 61st percentile of players at that level, 2022 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level4 levels played
0.0
83.3%
5W–1L · 72.3% of games
3.5
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0
64.5%
20W–11L · 55.4% of games
8.0
21.4%
3W–11L · 44.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history57 matches
L
2026-05-20 · #3 Doubles · with Russ DeMoss
−0.009about as expected — took 40% of games against 45% expected
6-4, 6-4
L
Jeff Gonzales / Robin Olson
2026-05-14 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Dan Wendling
−0.045below expectation — took 38% of games against 58% expected
3-6, 6-0, 1-0
L
2026-04-23 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Russ DeMoss
−0.007about as expected — took 43% of games against 47% expected
6-3, 6-7, 1-0
W
2026-04-09 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Russ DeMoss
+0.004about as expected — took 53% of games against 52% expected
2-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-04-02 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Russ DeMoss
−0.014about as expected — took 72% of games against 70% expected
6-0, 7-5
W
2026-03-27 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Russ DeMoss
+0.037better than expected — took 86% of games against 62% expected
6-2, 6-0
W
Wayne Sells / Jeff Gonzales
2026-03-12 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Philip Sterling
−0.049below expectation — took 47% of games against 67% expected
1-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2025-05-21 · #2 Doubles · with Dan Wendling
not counted — an opponent has no rating on record
7-5, 6-3
W
2025-04-25 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Dan Wendling
not counted — an opponent has no rating on record
6-2, 6-0
W
2025-04-17 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Richard Tippets
not counted — an opponent has no rating on record
6-3, 6-4
W
David Park / Craig Tompkins
2025-04-14 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Dan Wendling
not counted — an opponent has no rating on record
6-4, 6-4
L
Wayne Sells / John Bergin
2025-04-10 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Dan Wendling
not counted — an opponent has no rating on record
6-2, 4-6, 1-0
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.