← Teams

CGM-Reed/Logan

2025 Adult 65 & Over · 7.0 Men

7 players · average NTRP 3.36 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.18 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.28
Bruce Yang
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 30% · published 3.5
3.27
John Wallin
usually #3 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published 3.5
—
Augustin Belindean
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
—
Rolf Ellingsen
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.99
Dan Wendling
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
—
Hayward Reed
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3
—
Kimbal Logan
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Results9 ties
2025-05-21Lost 0–1
L#1 DoublesRolf Ellingsen / Rick Raivio vs Steven Keo / Terence Gariety4-6, 6-0, 1-0
2025-04-28Won 3–0
W#1 DoublesRick Raivio / Rolf Ellingsen vs David Ritchie / Alan Potts6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesBruce Yang / John Wallin vs Makoto Sakaguchi / Randolph Splitter6-1, 6-0
W#3 DoublesRichard Tippets / Hayward Reed vs Steven Grant / Randall Sinn6-1, 6-4
2025-04-25Won 3–0
W#1 DoublesRick Raivio / Rolf Ellingsen vs Alan Potts / Andrew Kitchen7-5, 6-1
W#2 DoublesRobert Shevlin / Dan Wendling vs Thomas Mehlhorn / Greg van Gasse6-2, 6-0
W#3 DoublesBruce Yang / John Wallin vs Randall Sinn / Steven Grant6-0, 6-4
2025-04-17Won 1–0
W#1 DoublesRolf Ellingsen / Rick Raivio vs Michael Archer / Michael Lavios6-2, 6-2
2025-04-14Won 2–1
W#1 DoublesBruce Yang / Hayward Reed vs Tommy Atkins / Kevin Meier6-4, 5-7, 1-0
L#2 DoublesJohn Wallin / Richard Tippets vs James Stenger / Steven Garlock7-6, 6-2
W#3 DoublesDan Wendling / Robert Shevlin vs David Park / Craig Tompkins6-4, 6-4
2025-04-10Lost 1–2
L#1 DoublesHayward Reed / Bruce Yang vs Craig Frasier / Jeff Wheeler5-7, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesRobert Shevlin / Dan Wendling vs Wayne Sells / John Bergin6-2, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesJohn Wallin / Richard Tippets vs Jeff Gonzales / Donny Cablao3-6, 7-6, 1-0
2025-04-03Won 2–1
W#1 DoublesRick Raivio / Rolf Ellingsen vs Tony Humpage / Chip Burczak6-4, 7-6
W#2 DoublesBruce Yang / Robert Shevlin vs Michael McCarthy / Mike Delman1-6, 6-1, 1-0
L#3 DoublesJohn Wallin / Richard Tippets vs Jim Lekas / Mark Mitchell6-1, 6-1
2025-03-24Lost 0–3
L#1 DoublesRobert Shevlin / Dan Wendling vs Steven Keo / Kirk Planck6-1, 6-2
L#2 DoublesRick Raivio / Augustin Belindean vs Paul Stutzman / Dale Christensen6-2, 3-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesHayward Reed / John Wallin vs Richard Gronostajski / Aaron Bowman7-5, 6-3
2025-03-11Lost 1–2
W#1 DoublesRick Raivio / Rolf Ellingsen vs Robert Piercy / Mitchell Whitehurst7-5, 7-6
L#2 DoublesAugustin Belindean / John Wallin vs Evan Cohn / Mister Archedon6-3, 6-3
L#3 DoublesKimbal Logan / Hayward Reed vs Lee Wiegand / Michael Kardas6-1, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

3.5
Bruce Yang
33W–74L career
1%98%1%
3.28
3.5
John Wallin
66W–61L career
5%91%4%
3.27
3.5
Augustin Belindean
28W–23L career · type S
not enough data
—
3.5
Rolf Ellingsen
43W–38L career
not enough data
—
3.5
Dan Wendling
52W–43L career
39%61%0%
2.99
3
Hayward Reed
34W–32L career
not enough data
—
3
Kimbal Logan
39W–57L career
not enough data
—

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.